Skip to main content

The association of intimate partner violence and contraceptive use: a multi-country analysis of demographic and health surveys



Intimate partner violence (IPV) affects millions of women each year and has been recognized as a leading cause of poor health, disability, and death among women of reproductive age. However, the existing studies about the association between IPV and contraceptive use have been found to be conflicting and relatively less studied, particularly in low and middle income countries, including Eastern Sub Saharan Africa (SSA). This study examines the relationship between IPV and contraceptive use in Eastern SSA countries.


The Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) from 2014 to 2017 were a multi-stage cluster sample survey of 30,715 ever married (or cohabitating) women of reproductive age from six countries. The six Eastern SSA datasets were pooled and multivariable logistic regression using a hierarchical approach was performed to examine the association between IPV and contraceptive use after adjusting for women, partners, and household and health facility factors.


Two thirds of women 67% [66.55, 67.88] were not using any modern contraceptive methods and almost half (48%) of the women had experienced at least one form of IPV from their partners. Our analysis showed a strong association with decreased odds of physical violence [adjusted odds ratios (aOR) = 0.72, 95%CI: 0.67, 0 0.78] among women not using any contraceptive methods. Other factors associated with women not using any contraceptive methods were older women (35–49 years), illiterate couples and women from poorest households. Women who had no access to any form of communication [aOR = 1.12, 95%CI: 1.08, 1.36], unemployed partner [aOR = 1.55, 95%CI: 1.23, 1.95] and women who travelled long distances to access health services [aOR = 1.16, 95%CI: 1.06, 1.26] significantly reported increased odds of not using any contraceptive methods.


Our study indicated that physical violence was negatively associated with not using any contraceptive method among married women in Eastern SSA countries. Tailored intervention messages to reduce IPV including physical violence among women not using contraceptive methods in East Africa should target those from low-socioeconomic groups especially, older women with no access to any form of communication, unemployed partners, and illiterate couples.


IPV includes acts of physical aggression, psychological abuse, sexual coercion and controlling behaviours within an intimate relationship [1]. IPV affects millions of women each year and has been recognized as a leading cause of poor health, disability, and death among women of reproductive age [2]. Population-based surveys found 13–61% of women throughout the world reported being physically assaulted by an intimate male partner during their lives from age 15 and 6–59% of women up to 49 years of age had experienced sexual assault by a partner at some point in their lives [3]. Specifically, within SSA countries, 44% of women have been victims of IPV [4].

Reproductive coercion and taking control of women’s reproductive health is one form of IPV (1). Women may be forced to engage in sexual intercourse or practise unprotected sex with their male partners and male partners may sabotage women’s use of contraceptives to increase their female partner’s dependency or to otherwise express their control over their partner’s decision-making [5, 6]. IPV has several effects on women’s physical, mental, and reproductive health [7, 8]. Reproductive health consequences of IPV include unintended pregnancy [9], sexually transmitted infections [10, 11] obstetric complications such as haemorrhage, abortion, and foetal complications [7, 12], and reduced utilization of maternal health services including contraceptive use [13]. Moreover, the effects of IPV are most pronounced in developing countries due to the limited efforts in preventing and supporting women’s recovery who have experienced IPV [9, 14].

A woman’s ability to control her own family planning choices is a critical aspect of her reproductive autonomy and key to increasing contraceptive use and decreasing unintended pregnancy [6]. Therefore, increasing the use of modern contraceptives among women is an important step towards reducing unintended pregnancies and related negative health outcomes [5, 6]. Moreover, contraceptive use is an important part of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) including Goal 3 regarding good health and well-being for all and Goal 5 on promoting equality and empowerment of women and girls [15].

However, the causal mechanisms between the association of women’s autonomy, experiences of IPV and contraceptive use are poorly understood [16]. The review from the existing studies have been found to be conflicting. In some settings, IPV has been found to be associated with a decreased likelihood of modern contraceptive use [17, 18]. However, studies conducted in other settings have found that IPV and contraceptive use are positively associated [19]. The associations between IPV and contraceptive use have been relatively less studied, particularly in low and middle income countries settings including SSA [20]. One of the main reason contradicting each other for studies conducted in SSA focused on small-scale studies [2, 9]. The small-scale studies conducted cannot be generalizable to the wider population. As a result, many SSA countries are yet to include the elimination of IPV on their policy agendas as a serious human rights violation with severe short and long-term implications [21]. Addressing this gap in knowledge can help in identifying the factors affecting contraceptive use among women experiencing IPV.

Understanding how IPV influences women’s ability to adopt contraception is central to designing family planning interventions that enable women who experience IPV to manage their fertility and to inform future interventions. Therefore, the current study assesses the associations of modern contraceptive use with IPV among a population-based sample of married women in Eastern SSA, where IPV is highly prevalent [22, 23].

Various theoretical approaches, views and frameworks have been adopted to explain the potential relation of IPV and other factors including family planning utilisation. The most widely used framework in public health research on IPV is the ecological framework. There are also arguments that there is no single theory that fully explains IPV because the causes are multifaceted, interrelated and contextual with dynamic non-linear pathways [24, 25]. The Ecological model considers the complex interplay between individual, relationship, community, and societal factors that may lead to IPV [26]. The study’s core research questions are: Are the use of contraceptives significantly associated with IPV among women in Eastern SSA countries? What are the other associated factors that affect recent contraceptive use? Improved understanding of these relationships may enhance our identification of risk factors. This, in turn, may inform the development of public health programs to better assist women facing IPV in Eastern SSA countries, as well as other similar settings.


Data source

This study used pooled data of six Eastern SSA countries from DHS which is a nationally representative survey. The countries included were Burundi (2017), Ethiopia (2016), Kenya (2014), Rwanda (2015), Tanzania (2016), and Uganda (2016) [27]. The survey involved the use of a two staged stratified sampling technique [27]. Women in the reproductive age group (15–49 years) were interviewed in each of the six Eastern SSA countries. From the sample households, women from selected households were chosen and completed the DHS domestic violence module. The domestic violence module was randomly administered to only one woman in a household if there was more than one woman living in that household. The unit of analysis for this study were women who were married or were cohabiting in the last five years preceding the survey.

Outcome variable

Recent contraceptive use was a dependent variable for this study. The DHS surveys on recent contraceptive use were defined as the most recent contraceptive use in the last five years at the time of the survey. It was described as contraceptive use in three categorical options “yes using any modern contraceptive method”; “yes using the traditional contraceptive method” and “never”. As such, for this study, the recent contraceptive use of respondents was categorized as “used modern contraceptive method” and “never/ traditional contraceptive use”. Finally, never or traditional contraceptive use was coded ‘0’ and use of modern contraceptive was coded ‘1’.

Predictor variable

The primary independent variables in the analysis included lifetime experiences of IPV (physical, sexual or emotional) by their current partner.

Experiences of IPV were the main variables for the analysis. IPV was measured by the experience of at least one or more forms of violence such as physical, sexual or emotional violence. The following were the key questions used to measure IPV in the DHS. Physical violence includes seven dimensions whilst emotional and sexual violence include three questions for each. All the questions were categorical with responses of yes or no. Women were asked whether they had experienced acts of violence within their relationship, perpetrated by their husband / partner. The below questions were categorised as experiencing any violence in their lifetime.

Physical violence experience questions included: (1) push you, shake you, or throw something at you? (2) slap you? (3) twist your arm or pull your hair? (4) punch you with his/her fist or with something that could hurt you? (5) kick you, drag you, or beat you up? (6) try to choke you or burn you on purpose? (7) threaten or attack you with a knife, gun, or any other weapon?

Sexual violence experience questions included: (1) physically force you to have sexual intercourse with him even when you did not want to? (2) physically force you to perform any other sexual acts you did not want to? (3) force you with threats or in any other way to perform sexual acts you did not want to?

Emotional violence experience questions included: (1) say or do something to humiliate you in front of others? (2) threaten to hurt or harm you or someone close to you? (3) insult you or make you feel bad about yourself?

Explanatory variables

In addition, other factors related to women’s demographic factors (such as age, education, employment status, knowledge of family planning, occupation, religion, alcohol use) are important factors that are associated with contraception utilisation [5, 6, 7]. For instance, as women’s education improved, the likelihood of contraceptive use increased for various reasons [2, 6, 17] including, partner’s factors (e.g. age, education, controlling behaviour, consuming alcohol, physical violence, employment) [12,14], household factors (including wealth, access to information and health facility access) [2, 9, 14], and community factors identified from the literature review [2, 28] were also included in the analysis.

The following variables were defined and recorded as follows:

Decision-making skills of women refers to women participating in decision-making if they make decisions alone or jointly with their partner. This included women who participate in all decision-making about major purchases, health care access and visits to family and relatives. For this analysis, decision-making was categorised as full (participation in all of the decision-making dimensions), considerable participation (at least in one) and no decision-making (no participation in any decision-making).

Wealth index is a composite measure of a household’s cumulative living standard. The wealth index is calculated using easy-to-collect data on a household’s ownership of selected assets, such as televisions and bicycles; materials used for housing construction; and types of water access and sanitation facilities. DHS separates all interviewed households into five wealth quintiles (very poor, poor, medium, rich and richest). In this analysis we merged poorest and poor which was categorised as” poor”, and rich and richest was categorised in one group” rich”.

Justification or acceptance of women towards physical violence was dichotomized (justified/not justified). Women’s acceptance towards physical violence was measured by computing the following variables (burning food, arguing with the husband, going out without telling the husband, neglecting the children, and refusing to have sexual intercourse with the husband). If women responded “yes” to at least one of the above five variables, they were considered to accept physical violence (See Supplementary Table A).


The study used the Svyset command to account for a complex survey design and to provide unbiased estimates for odds ratios (OR) and their confidence intervals (CI’s). STATA version 16.0 was used for analysis. A chi-square test was used to assess the association of IPV and other covariates with current contraceptive use. Multi-collinearity of the independent variable was checked before running multivariable models. Hierarchical logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the effects of various forms of IPV and other factors on contraceptive use. The analysis used ecological tool as an explanatory tool for analysis. To avoid an excessive number of variables and unstable estimates in the subsequent model, only variables that reached a p-value less than 0.05 were kept in the subsequent analyses except the predictor variable (22). The final models for analysis underwent the following processes to fit the final model. Model 1: Estimates of the effects of IPV (Physical, sexual and emotional violence) on contraceptive use; Model 2: The effects of selected demographic factors of women on contraceptive use; Model 3: The effects of selected household level demographic associated factors on contraceptive use; Model 4: The effects of selected partner level factors on contraceptive use. Model 5: The effects of selected community and health facilities factors on contraceptive use. Only covariates that showed significance in the model (2 to 5) (p < 0.05) and all forms of IPV were included in the final model. The final model involved the combined effects of all from IPV and all other associated factors associated with contraceptive use (See Table 1).

Table 1 Potential covariates used for hierarchical survey logistic regression model

Ethical clearance

All DHS surveys are approved by the Inner City Fund (ICF) international and an institutional review board in specific countries to ensure that they comply with the United States Department of Health and Human Services’ regulations to protect human subjects. Additionally, the Western Sydney University Ethics Committee has approved the research protocol. In all phases, the data included in this analysis contain no identifying information and are publicly available.


Descriptive results of current family planning use and IPV in Eastern SSA countries

This study covered the six Eastern SSA countries’ DHS data with a weighted sample of 30,715 married or cohabiting women conducted between 2014 and 2017. Table 2 shows the different study variables using both weighted and unweighted frequencies and proportions.

Figure 1 revealed that only a third of women were current users of family planning in Eastern SSA, and that more than two-thirds of women (67.22% [66.55, 67.88]) were not using family planning at the time of the surveys. The contraceptive utilisation rate was lowest in Burundi at 20% [19.32, 21.47] and relatively higher in Kenya (49.6% [47.6, 51.67], that has better contraceptive utilisation in comparison to other Eastern SSA countries

Table 2 Characteristics of the study variables in Eastern SSA countries from 2014–2017
Fig. 1
figure 1

Prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of non-use of contraceptives

In Eastern SSA, almost half (48%) of the women have experienced at least one form of IPV from their partners. The prevalence varies by country, where Uganda (56%) and Burundi (50%) and Tanzania (49.5%) were the top three countries with the highest proportion of women who reported IPV (See Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Prevalence and 95% confidence intervals of IPV (Physical, sexual, or emotional violence)

Factors associated with contraceptive use including IPV and current contraceptive use in Eastern SSA countries

This study showed there was an association between current contraceptive use and IPV. The Pearson chi-square associations showed women who had experienced any form of IPV were more likely to use family planning at the time of the survey in comparison to women who did not experience any form of IPV (See Table 3). In the bivariate analysis, women who experienced physical violence were more likely to use contraceptives in comparison to women who had experiences of sexual or emotional violence.

Overall, the results have revealed that family planning use is associated with women’s age, women’s education status, marital status, number of times being married, religion and the number of living children. For example, contraceptive use among illiterate women was more than 10% lower than those women who had secondary or higher education levels in Eastern SSA countries. Similarly, contraceptive utilisation was associated with a female-headed household, women being categorised as a rich socioeconomic class, women who did not accept physical violence, and those women who have access to social media or other communication outlets. For instance, women in the rich wealth quartile had relatively higher contraceptive utilisation (37.84% [36.68, 39.01] in comparison to women in the poor wealth quartile 26.88% [25.97, 27.8] (See Table 3).

Table 3 Prevalence of never or traditional use of contraceptive by IPV, community, household, women demographics, partner and barriers to woman’s health care factors in Eastern SSA countries

Χ2-test was applied to test statistical significance for the prevalence estimates. UOR = unadjusted odds ratios. Odds ratios (ORs) statistically greater that 1.00 indicate risk factors and those statistically smaller than 1.00 are protective factors. 95% confidence intervals (CI) around ORs that lies between 1.00 indicate not statistically significant.

Younger age, women’s higher education status, employment, partners’ controlling behaviour and partners consuming less alcohol were associated with women’s increased recent contraceptive utilisation in Eastern SSA countries. Similarly, current contraceptive non-use was associated with barriers to health care due to lack of permission from partner, travelling long distances, having no money and lack of an accompanying support person ( P < 0.001) (See Table 3). In addition, women who resided in rural residences had a 10% less chance of contraceptive use in comparison to women residing in an urban residence in Eastern SSA countries.

Multiple logistic regression results

Association between IPV and non-use of contraceptive

The analysis of hierarchical logistic regressions showed women who were exposed to physical violence were more likely to use contraceptives 0.72 [0.67, 0 0.78]. Alternatively, there were no significant differences in contraceptives use among women who were exposed to sexual and emotional violence in comparison to those who were not exposed.

Factors associated with non-use of contraceptive

In addition, not using contraceptives was associated with: women who were older 0.84 [0.74, 0 0.95], women with older partners 0.77 [0.65, 0.91], women with little or no education 1.49 [1.31, 1.69], women with an illiterate partner 1.19 [1.04, 1.34], women who had poor wealth quintiles 1.34 [1.23, 1.46], women with no communication access 1.19 [1.09, 1.29], women who had barriers gaining permission 1.17 [1.03, 1.31] and women with no money to access health care 1.11 [1.03, 1.19] (p < 0.001). For instance, women with higher socioeconomic status were 1.34 times more likely to use contraceptives in comparison to women with lower socioeconomic status. Similarly, women who had experienced physical violence had a 28% higher chance of using contraceptives in comparison with those who did not experience physical violence (See Table 4).

Table 4 Multiple logistic regression analysis of adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of IPV, individual, household and partner variables associated factors of contraceptive non-use amongst married women of 15–49 years of age in Eastern SSA countries


This study has explored current contraceptive use and IPV among a large representative sample of married or cohabiting women in Eastern SSA countries using the ecological model as an explanatory tool. IPV affects millions of women each year and has been recognized as a leading cause for poor health, disability, and death among women of reproductive age [2].

In this study, there were a variability in IPV prevalence in Easter SSA countries and this will affect the utilization of decision making on the use of contraceptive in those countries. This was clearly explained by a previous studies using ecological model approach study. For instance, a systematic review and meta-analysis study conducted in SSA countries shows a plethora of information on the overall associated factors that augment the occurrences of IPV in SSA countries [29]. This systematic review has identified that women’s experiences of IPV in SSA are associated with many factors that are related to individual, interpersonal, community and societal levels. Pooled meta-analyses revealed that low educational attainment, higher alcohol consumption, substance use, history of child and family abuse, limited decision-making skills, experiencing depression, males having multiple sexual partners, and younger age were found to be individual- and family-associated factors that increase the experiences of IPV [29]. Community tolerant attitudes to violence, women’s unemployment, being Muslim, lower socioeconomic class, food and social insecurity were found to be community- and societal-associated factors of IPV [29]. Alcohol consumption, low educational attainment, experiencing depression, being younger, a history of child and family abuse, tolerant attitudes to violence, and low socioeconomic status were poignant factors associated with IPV amongst women in SSA countries [29]. Those factors difference in Easter SSA countries affects the occurrence IPV and it will affect directly and indirectly affect the utilization of contraceptive.

Investing in family planning is one of the smart investments for development programs as population dynamics have a fundamental influence on the SDGs [15, 30]. This study has shown that women who currently used contraceptives were significantly associated with women’s experiences of physical violence during their lifetime. This is consistent with previous research in many developing and developed countries including New Zealand [19, 31,32,33,34] that identified violence increased contraceptive use.

In analysing data from the ten DHS national surveys from all world regions, Hindin, Kishor, and Ansara [33] found that in seven out of ten countries, ever having used contraception was positively associated with IPV. In the detail, analysis the short acting family planning were more associated with IPV as compared to the long acting family planning including injectables, and pills and emergency contraceptives. This might be related to the following reasons: (i) Women who had an experience of violence might be more likely to use contraceptives because of fears of living with a violent partner (27). Most women might expect to leave their marriage to reduce the risk of pregnancy and caring for an extra child with increased risk of physical violence from their partner (27–29). One possible explanation for higher contraceptive use that has been suggested is that women in abusive relationships may attempt to prevent pregnancy because they do not want to bring a child into a violent family setting [32, 33]. However, their use of contraceptives may be hidden from their partner; (ii) and/or women may have a heightened awareness of their risk of an unintended pregnancy or sexually transmitted infections. In contrast, many other studies showed an opposite relation between contraceptive use and IPV with women who experienced IPV being less likely to use contraceptives [2, 35,36,37].

Similarly, contraceptive utilisation decreased with older women. This may be due to the fact that younger women have sufficient information or awareness about contraceptive use and the benefits of family planning in comparison with older women who are less educated. Additionally, older women may have enough children and not want any more children in comparison to younger women [38,39,40].

Younger women who engaged in sexual intercourse before the age of 18 years were less likely to use contraceptives in comparison to those who commenced having sexual intercourse after the age of 18. This may be related to women who engage in sexual intercourse at younger ages being more likely to engage in risky behaviours. This finding is consistent with other studies that showed early intercourse has been associated with engaging in risky behaviours that included not using condoms or contraceptives that subsequently resulted in unintended pregnancies [41, 42].

In our study, women who were more educated were more likely to use contraceptives in comparison to those who were illiterate. This finding is consistent with a study conducted by WHO and others [2, 36, 37]. Most interestingly, women who had a higher education level had a 51% higher chance of using contraceptives in comparison to illiterate women in Eastern SSA countries. Women who were illiterate were 1.49 times more likely not to use contraceptives in comparison with women who had a higher education level. Women who are more educated are more likely to have a better understanding of reproductive health and contraceptive use which may be related to knowledge, awareness and attitudes, which drives the demand for contraceptive methods. This demand may evoke pressure on reproductive health service providers including governments to provide family planning commodities [43, 44].

This study showed the disparity of contraceptive use among various wealth quintiles. The inequality is more noticeable among the poorest quintiles [45, 46]. It indicates that household assets among poor families are more controlled by men who can access health facilities and health care. The poorest women may not, therefore, be able to use contraceptives of their choice and hence, be denied optimal family planning opportunities. Therefore, lower socioeconomic or wealth status of women is one key factor explaining low rates of modern contraceptive use. It also determines women’s low decision-making power to decide and access permission for contraceptive use and access health facilities [47, 48].

Overall, according to this study, poorer women were less likely to use transport and be controlled by their partners that resulted in not being able to access family planning services and use contraceptives. Additionally, this may be indirectly related to poor women having less access to education or media outlets to get a better understanding about the benefits of contraceptives. Gender wealth disparity, lack of access to any media, and limited permission to attend medical or health facilities are factors that negatively influence the use of contraceptives. These findings are consistent with other studies [49, 50]. It is clear that a higher prevalence of contraceptive use is found among women who have more knowledge, awareness, and media exposure. Our findings are consistent with these studies, as those women (aged 15–49) who have greater media exposure have more knowledge about contraceptive measures [51,52,53].

This study has shown the high disparity amongst women experiencing contraceptive utilisation living in rural and urban areas. Women living in rural areas were less likely to be exposed to contraceptive use than women who lived in urban setting settings. This finding may be attributed to women residing in urban areas having greater accessibility to family planning, and a better awareness about the benefits of family planning to prevent unintended pregnancy [2]. Moreover, legal practices and social protection are relatively better in urban settings in comparison to women living in a rural setting [2]. The community acceptance for male dominance in rural settings is relatively higher in comparison to women in urban areas and women are more empowered in urban residences; subsequently contributing to the utilisation of contraceptive use. This finding is consistent with a study conducted in rural India that demonstrated a lower contraceptive use and a higher experience of unintended pregnancy [54, 55]. Similarly, a study conducted in Ethiopia showed women in rural settings experienced higher unintended pregnancies and lower contraceptive use[23, 56]. In summary, it is important to consider and to distinguish that widespread education is primarily targeted to the individual, when greater structural changes (such as increased access to family planning in rural areas) may be more effective in eradicating and reducing IPV.

One of the interesting findings in this study showed that women whose household was headed by a male, were 1.4 times less likely to use contraceptives and this is associated with women’s disempowerment. Women negotiating the use of family planning is likely to occur less in households headed by males. Hence, increased power of decision-making on major household purchases, seeking health care services and attending public meetings were also positively influenced by the head of the household [47, 57]. Therefore, addressing women’s empowerment could provide a multipronged boost in the utilisation of contraceptives.

Strength and Limitations of the Study

This study strength included the use of the standard measurement tools from DHS measures and large data sets from six Eastern SSA countries. It also used a rigorous analysis to identify the effects of IPV on intended pregnancy. The limitation of this study shows no causality of effects due to the nature of the cross-sectional design. Additionally, this study is only limited to DHS questionnaires and lacks some factors related to refugees, internally displaced people, and people who have travelled from other parts of the country, where IPV may be under reported. Another limitation of DHS surveys is subject to reporting and recall biases, the period of the DHS is not the same for all the countries and this also cause pose some challenges on the pooling of the datasets. Furthermore, the disadvantage of using a standardized questionnaire is that there are limited opportunities to adapt the questionnaire to be locally relevant. Additions, deletions and changes are made in every DHS survey, but the number of modifications is limited in order to maintain comparability, limit complexity of the survey, and keep the length of the questionnaire within limits.


Women in Eastern SSA countries had a low rate of contraceptive utilisation and experienced higher rates of IPV. Physical violence was significantly positively associated with recent contraceptive use among married or cohabiting women in Eastern SSA. Additionally, recent contraceptive utilisation was associated with younger women, wealthier households, more educated women and exposure to various communication media, less barriers to accessing permission from the partner and less distances travelled to health care services. Hence, understanding how IPV affects women’s contraceptive use has important implications for ensuring that contraceptive access in the prevention programs can better meet the needs of women who experience IPV. Most importantly, minimizing the disparity with women and gender equality are important aspects to enhance contraceptive utilisation and prevention of IPV in Eastern SSA countries.

Data availability

All the data available used are included in this study. Additionally, the original data from the survey are available online at measure DHS website.



Intimate partner violence


Demographic and Health Surveys


Eastern SSA, adjusted odds ratios


odds ratios


confidence intervals


Sustainable Development Goals


Inner City Fund

Χ2 :



unadjusted odds ratios


  1. Krug EG, Dahlberg LL, Mercy JA, Zwi AB. and L. R., World report on violence and health. World Health Organization: Geneva; 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. WHO., Global and regional estimates of violence against women. Prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence.WHO, 2013.

  3. WHO, Preventing intimate partner and sexual violence against women: taking action and generating evidence. 2010, WHO: Geneva

  4. Muluneh MD, Stulz V, Francis L, Agho K. Gender based violence against women in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(5):903.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Miller E, McCauley HL, Tancredi DJ, Decker MR, Anderson H, Silverman JG. Recent reproductive coercion and unintended pregnancy among female family planning clients. Contraception. 2014;89(2):122–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hill AL, Jones KA, McCauley HL, Tancredi DJ, Silverman JG, Miller E. Reproductive Coercion and relationship abuse among adolescents and young women seeking care at School Health Centers. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(2):351–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Black MC. Intimate Partner violence and adverse Health Consequences:implications for clinicians. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2011;5(5):428–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Campbell JC. Health consequences of intimate partner violence. Lancet. 2002;359(9314):1331–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Christina C, Pallitto C, Garcia-Moreno, Henrica AFM, Jansen L, Heise M, Elsberg, Watts C. Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. The Lancet. 2006;368(9543):1260–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Laanpere M, Ringmets I, Part K, Karro H. Intimate partner violence and sexual health outcomes: a population-based study among 16-44-year-old women in Estonia. Eur J Public Health. 2013;23(4):688–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sori AT. Poverty, sexual experience and HIV vulnerability risks: evidence from Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. J Biosoc Sci. 2012;44(6):677–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Devries KM, Kishor S, Johnson H, Stöckl H, Bacchus LJ, Garcia-Moreno C, Watts C. Intimate partner violence during pregnancy: analysis of prevalence data from 19 countries. Reprod Health Matters. 2010;18(36):158–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mohammed BH, Johnston JM, Harwell JI, Yi H, Tsang KW-k, Haidar JA. Intimate partner violence and utilization of maternal health care services in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):178.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Stöckl H, Devries K, Rotstein A, Abrahams N, Campbell J, Watts C, Moreno CG. The global prevalence of intimate partner homicide: a systematic review. Lancet. 2013;382(9895):859–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. United Nations General Assembly. Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. 2015; Available from:

  16. Jewkes R, Flood M, Lang J. From work with men and boys to changes of social norms and reduction of inequities in gender relations: a conceptual shift in prevention of violence against women and girls. The Lancet. 2015;385(9977):1580–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Raj A, McDougal L, Reed E, Silverman JG. Associations of marital violence with different forms of contraception: cross-sectional findings from South Asia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;130(Suppl):E56–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen GL, Silverman JG, Dixit A, Begum S, Ghule M, Battala M, Johns NE, Raj A, Averbach S. A cross-sectional analysis of intimate partner violence and family planning use in rural India. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;21:100318–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Fanslow J, Whitehead A, Silva M, Robinson E. Contraceptive use and associations with intimate partner violence among a population-based sample of New Zealand women. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;48(1):83–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Silverman JG, Boyce SC, Dehingia N, Rao N, Chandurkar D, Nanda P, Hay K, Atmavilas Y, Saggurti N, Raj A. Reproductive coercion in Uttar Pradesh, India: prevalence and associations with partner violence and reproductive health. SSM - population health. 2019;9:100484–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Olalekan A, Uthman S, Lawoko, Moradi T. Factors associated with attitudes towards intimate partner violence against women: a comparative analysis of 17 sub-Saharan countries.BMC international Journal and Human rights, 2009.

  22. Tiruye TY, Chojenta C, Harris ML, Holliday E, Loxton D. Intimate partner violence against women and its association with pregnancy loss in Ethiopia: evidence from a national survey. BMC Womens Health. 2020;20(1):192.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Muluneh MD, Francis L, Agho K, Stulz V. Mapping of Intimate Partner Violence: Evidence From a National Population Survey.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2021: p.0886260521997954.

  24. Rees K, Zweigenthal V, Joyner K. Health sector responses to intimate partner violence: a literature review. Afr J Prim Health Care Family Med. 2014;6(1):E1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen HAFM, Ellsberg M, Heise L, Watts CH. Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. The Lancet. 2006;368(9543):1260–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Krug EG, Dahlberg LL, Mercy JA, Zwi AB. and R. Lozano, world report on violence and health: World Health Organization. Switzerland: Geneva; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  27. USAID. DHS Measure program 2019 [cited 2019 20 Nov]; Available from:

  28. Ranganathan M, Buller AM. Household decision-making and its association with intimate partner violence: Examining differences in men’s and women’s perceptions in Uganda. SSM - Population Health, 2019. 8 (no pagination).

  29. Muluneh MD, Francis L, Agho K, Stulz V. Review and Meta-analysis of Associated factors of gender-based violence against women in Sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(9):4407.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. WHO. Understanding and addressing violence against women. Switzerland: Geneva; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Oddens BJ, Lehert P. Determinants of contraceptive use among women of reproductive age in Great Britain and Germany. I: demographic factors. J Biosoc Sci. 1997;29(4):415–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Alio AP, Daley EM, Nana PN, Duan J, Salihu HM. Intimate partner violence and contraception use among women in Sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2009;107(1):35–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hindin M, Kishor S. and A. D, Intimate partner violence among couples in 10 DHS countries: predictors and health outcomes. DHS Analytical Studies no 18 DHS Analytical Studies Calverton. MD: Macro International; 2008.

  34. Ansara DL, Hindin MJ. Psychosocial consequences of intimate Partner violence for women and men in Canada. J interpers Violence. 2011;26(8):1628–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tomar S, Dehingia N, Dey AK, Chandurkar D, Raj A, Silverman JG. Associations of intimate partner violence and reproductive coercion with contraceptive use in Uttar Pradesh, India: how associations differ across contraceptive methods. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(10):e0241008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Garcı ´a-Moreno C. and A. A, The sustainable development goals, violence and women’s and children’s health. WHO; 2016.

  37. Chernet AG, Cherie KT. Prevalence of intimate partner violence against women and associated factors in Ethiopia. BMC Womens Health. 2020;20(1):22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Abrahams N, Devries K, Watts C, Pallitto C, Petzold M, Shamu S. García-Moreno, Worldwide prevalence of non-partner sexual violence: a systematic review. The Lancet. 2014;383(9929):1648–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Abrahams N, Jewkes R, Laubscher R, Hoffman M. Intimate partner violence: prevalence and risk factors for men in Cape Town, South Africa. Violence Vict. 2006;21:247–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Magnusson BM, Masho SW, Lapane KL. Early age at first intercourse and subsequent gaps in contraceptive use. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012;21(1):73–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tamang L, Raynes-Greenow C, McGeechan K, Black K. Factors associated with contraceptive use among sexually active nepalese youths in the Kathmandu Valley. Contracept Reproductive Med. 2017;2(1):13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ariho P, Kabagenyi A. Age at first marriage, age at first sex, family size preferences, contraception and change in fertility among women in Uganda: analysis of the 2006–2016 period. BMC Womens Health. 2020;20(1):8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Ensor T, Cooper S. Overcoming barriers to health service access: influencing the demand side. Health Policy Plan. 2004;19(2):69–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Arends-Kuenning M, Kessy FL. The impact of demand factors, quality of care and access to facilities on contraceptive use in Tanzania. J Biosoc Sci. 2007;39(1):1–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Habumuremyi PD, Zenawi M. Making family planning a national development priority. Lancet. 2012;380(9837):78–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Yigzaw M, Zakus D, Tadesse Y, Desalegn M, Fantahun M. Paving the way for universal family planning coverage in Ethiopia: an analysis of wealth related inequality. Int J Equity Health. 2015;14(1):77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Loll D, Fleming PJ, Manu A, Morhe E, Stephenson R, King EJ, Hall KS. Reproductive Autonomy and Modern Contraceptive Use at Last Sex among Young Women in Ghana. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2019;45:1–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Muluneh MD, Francis L, Ayele M, Abebe S, Makonnen M, Stulz V. The Effect of Women’s Empowerment in the Utilisation of Family Planning in Western Ethiopia: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach.Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021. 18(12).

  49. Kabagenyi A, Reid A, Ntozi J, Atuyambe L. Socio-cultural inhibitors to use of modern contraceptive techniques in rural Uganda: a qualitative study. Pan Afr Med J. 2016;25:78–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Belaid L, Dumont A, Chaillet N, Zertal A, De Brouwere V, Hounton S, Ridde V. Effectiveness of demand generation interventions on use of modern contraceptives in low- and middle-income countries. Trop Med Int Health. 2016;21(10):1240–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Slaymaker E, Scott RH, Palmer MJ, Palla L, Marston M, Gonsalves L, Say L, Wellings K. Trends in sexual activity and demand for and use of modern contraceptive methods in 74 countries: a retrospective analysis of nationally representative surveys. The Lancet Global Health. 2020;8(4):e567–79.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Chen MS, Nekkanti M, Mulawa MI. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Women’s Past-Year Physical IPV Perpetration and Victimization in Tanzania.Journal of interpersonal violence, 2017: p.886260517738775.

  53. Jabeen S, Rathor A, Riaz M, Zakar R, Fischer F. Demand- and supply-side factors associated with the use of contraceptive methods in Pakistan: a comparative study of demographic and health surveys, 1990–2018. BMC Womens Health. 2020;20(1):265–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Ahinkorah BO, Seidu A-A, Appiah F, Oduro JK, Sambah F, Baatiema L, Budu E, Ameyaw EK. Effect of sexual violence on planned, mistimed and unwanted pregnancies among women of reproductive age in sub-saharan Africa: a multi-country analysis of demographic and health surveys. SSM - Population Health. 2020;11:100601.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Ahinkorah BO, Dickson KS, Seidu AA. Women decision-making capacity and intimate partner violence among women in sub-saharan Africa. Archives of Public Health. 2018;76:10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Tiruye TY, Harris ML, Chojenta C, Holliday E, Loxton D. Intimate partner violence against women in Ethiopia and its association with unintended pregnancy: a national cross-sectional survey. Int J Public Health. 2020;65(9):1657–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Muluneh MD, Francis L, Ayele M, Abebe S, Makonnen M, Stulz V. The effect of women’s empowerment in the Utilisation of Family Planning in Western Ethiopia: a structural equation Modelling Approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(12):6550.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references




The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



M.D.M., V.S., L.F. and K.A. were involved in the conceptualization of this study. M.D.M. carried out the analysis and drafted the manuscript. V.S., L.Y. and K.A. were involved in the revision and editing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muluken Dessalegn Muluneh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study used secondary data that are available in the public domain of DHS. All DHS surveys were approved by the Inner-City Fund (ICF) international and an institutional review board. In addition, ethical approval was secured from Western Sydney University Ethics Committee as a requirement for academic study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muluneh, M.D., Francis, L., Agho, K. et al. The association of intimate partner violence and contraceptive use: a multi-country analysis of demographic and health surveys. Int J Equity Health 22, 75 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: