Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

20-year trends in multimorbidity by race/ethnicity among hospitalized patient populations in the United States

International Journal for Equity in Health volume 22, Article number: 137 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The challenges presented by multimorbidity continue to rise in the United States. Little is known about how the relative contribution of individual chronic conditions to multimorbidity has changed over time, and how this varies by race/ethnicity. The objective of this study was to describe trends in multimorbidity by race/ethnicity, as well as to determine the differential contribution of individual chronic conditions to multimorbidity in hospitalized populations over a 20-year period within the United States.

Methods

This is a serial cross-sectional study using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 1993 to 2012. We identified all hospitalized patients aged ≥ 18 years old with available data on race/ethnicity. Multimorbidity was defined as the presence of 3 or more conditions based on the Elixhauser comorbidity index. The relative change in the proportion of hospitalized patients with multimorbidity, overall and by race/ethnicity (Black, White, Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander, Native American) were tabulated and presented graphically. Population attributable fractions were estimated from modified Poisson regression models adjusted for sex, age, and insurance type. These fractions were used to describe the relative contribution of individual chronic conditions to multimorbidity over time and across racial/ethnic groups.

Results

There were 123,613,970 hospitalizations captured within the NIS between 1993 and 2012. The prevalence of multimorbidity increased in all race/ethnic groups over the 20-year period, most notably among White, Black, and Native American populations (+ 29.4%, + 29.7%, and + 32.0%, respectively). In both 1993 and 2012, Black hospitalized patients had a higher prevalence of multimorbidity (25.1% and 54.8%, respectively) compared to all other race/ethnic groups. Native American populations exhibited the largest overall increase in multimorbidity (+ 32.0%). Furthermore, the contribution of metabolic diseases to multimorbidity increased, particularly among Hispanic patients who had the highest population attributable fraction values for diabetes without complications (15.0%), diabetes with complications (5.1%), and obesity (5.8%).

Conclusions

From 1993 to 2012, the secular increases in the prevalence of multimorbidity as well as changes in the differential contribution of individual chronic conditions has varied substantially by race/ethnicity. These findings further elucidate the racial/ethnic gaps prevalent in multimorbidity within the United States.

Prior presentations

Preliminary finding of this study were presented at the Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM) Annual Conference, Washington, DC, April 21, 2017.

Introduction

Multimorbidity is defined as the presence of multiple chronic medical conditions in a single individual. Patients with multimorbidity are more likely to suffer from lower quality of life, poor functionality, and are at risk of premature mortality compared to those without multimorbidity [1,2,3]. Because of the complex nature of multimorbidity, patients often require the involvement of multiple specialists, polypharmacy, longer hospital stays, and are at a greater risk of readmission [4, 5] – all of which contribute to high health care utilization and costs [6]. The challenges posed by multimorbidity will continue to mount as its prevalence increases, fueled in part by socioeconomic inequities that disproportionately affect certain groups more than others. In the United States (US), these are often racialized populations [7,8,9]. Furthermore, with increasing life expectancy and an aging population, the burden of multimorbidity is likely to become even greater.

Research indicates there may be differences in the trends and patterns of multimorbidity in certain groups, which may influence their overall health outcomes. These differences are often attributed to sociodemographic, economic, environmental, and behavioral risk factors which can vary substantially across groups [10, 11]. For instance, several studies have described variations in the trends and patterns of multimorbidity based on sex, age, and socioeconomic status [10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Previous studies have also described changes in the prevalence of many individual chronic conditions across racial/ethnic groups [17,18,19]. Further, the prevalence of multimorbidity has increased with reports indicating that ischemic heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure are among the most prevalent chronic conditions among hospitalized adults in the US [20, 21]. However, few studies have fully described the variation in multimorbidity by race/ethnicity. Further, it remains unclear how multimorbidity and the relative contributions of each individual condition have changed differentially by race/ethnicity over time.

In the US, evidence shows that racial and ethnic minorities are at greater risk of morbidity, mortality, and lower quality health care for certain chronic conditions compared to those who are White [22,23,24]. Such prevalent health inequities make it critical to distinguish and explain variation in the prevalence of multimorbidity and individual chronic conditions across racial/ethnic groups. The objective of our study was to describe trends in multimorbidity by race/ethnicity (i.e., White, Black, Hispanic, Native American, and Asian/Pacific Islander), as well as to determine the patterns and differential contribution of individual chronic conditions to multimorbidity in a hospitalized patient population over a 20-year period within the United States.

Methods

Data sources

Data was obtained using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) as part of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) led by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). This partnership between industry and federal/state authorities was developed to report national and regional estimates of inpatient clinical and resource use [25]. The NIS is a publicly available all-payer inpatient care database containing a stratified sample of discharges (~ 20%) from all US community hospitals each year. Community hospitals are defined by the NIS as “all non-Federal, short-term, general, and other specialty hospitals, excluding hospital units of institutions”. This includes academic medical centers and specialty hospitals such as short-term rehabilitation, obstetric, and pediatric hospitals. Non-community hospitals include institutions such as federal hospitals (e.g., Veterans Administration, Indian Health Service hospitals, and Department of Defense), long-term hospitals, psychiatric hospitals, and hospital units within institutions such as prisons. To account for sampling redesign over time, HCUP provides NIS Trend Weights to allow for the analysis of year-to-year trends. Each de-identified record contains information on patient demographics (e.g., age, sex, race, ethnicity, etc.), primary payer, diagnoses, procedures, length of stay, and hospital characteristics (e.g., hospital ownership, number of beds, teaching status, urban/rural location, and the census division of the hospital) [25]. As this data is publicly available, protected by law and did not contain patient identifiers, the Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board at the University of Calgary deemed this study exempt from ethics review. This study follows the reporting guidelines outlined within the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement [26].

Exposure

We analyzed annual data on all hospitalized adults (≥ 18 years old) from 1993 to 2012 (20 years). The exposure of interest in our study was race/ethnicity. While ‘race’ and ‘ethnicity’ are often used interchangeably, there are differences between them. Race is a social construct historically used to arbitrarily group populations according to their physical characteristics (e.g., skin color) for social, political, economic, and cultural motivations [27, 28]. However, ethnicity is a much broader construct which is used to encompass cultural and social traditions, ancestry, language, and geographical origins [27, 28]. All participating community hospitals supplied data on the race of hospitalized patients, and some provided both race and ethnicity separately. When both race and ethnicity data were made available, HCUPs databases give precedence to ethnicity (specifically Hispanic) over race in setting the value for a race or ethnicity variable. However, because HCUPs does not distinguish ethnicity and race in each record, both constructs were used to define our exposure. Our final categorization of race/ethnicity included: White, Black, Hispanic, Native American, Asian/Pacific Islander, and other. Hospitalized patients were stratified according to the first five race/ethnic groups (excluding ‘other’ from the analysis).

Outcome

The primary outcome was multimorbidity defined as the presence of 3 or more conditions as per prior research [29,30,31,32]. We used the Elixhauser comorbidity index to define 30 individual chronic conditions within the hospitalization record of each person. These conditions are associated with increased hospital costs, length of stay, and mortality [33, 34] and were determined from hospital discharge records using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM).

Other variables of interest

In this study, demographic variables such as age and sex were included. Age was categorized as 18–44, 45–64, 65–74, and 75 or over which are well-defined cut-points in health services research and roughly reflect quartiles of the age distribution. Sex was categorized by the NIS as either male or female [35], and throughout this study, the term ‘sex’ is used to refer to biological and physiological differences between males and females, such as differences in reproductive organs and sex chromosomes.

The NIS also provides insurance type, or the expected primary payer (Medicare, Medicaid, Private Insurance, and Other). Medicaid is a public health insurance for some low-income families, pregnant women and children, the elderly, and people with disabilities [36]. Medicare is also a public health insurance program for people age 65 or older, some younger people with disabilities and people with end stage renal disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) [37]. Because the primary payer was missing for a small proportion of hospitalized patients (0.3%), the insurance type variable was constructed using other general groups as outlined in the NIS data dictionary [38]. For instance, “Medicaid” includes both fee-for-service and Medicaid coverage plans managed by private companies. “Medicare” also includes both fee-for-service and Medicare coverage plans managed by private companies. “Private insurance” included commercial carriers, private health maintenance organizations and preferred provider organizations. The category of “Other” included all other government programs such as Worker’s compensation, Title V, and CHAMPUS.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to determine the relative change in the proportion of hospitalized patients with multimorbidity both overall and stratified by race/ethnicity. Hospitalization data were analyzed separately by year (1993–2012) then blocked into 5-year bands and reported as percent change. Changes in the overall number of chronic conditions among hospitalized patients was displayed graphically by year. Additionally, line graphs were used to show the proportion of hospitalized patients with multimorbidity across all race/ethnicity groups stratified by age, in both 1993 and 2012.

We used population attributable fractions (PAF) to describe the relative influence of individual chronic conditions within the construct of multimorbidity over time and across racial/ethnic groups [39, 40]. PAF represents the proportion of multimorbidity that (theoretically) would not occur if the individual chronic condition was not present in the population. To allow for estimation of PAF, we first created multivariable modified Poisson models. Based on descriptive statistics and univariate Poisson modelling, we then created final models for each 5-year block including multimorbidity as the dependent variable and all comorbidities, with age, sex, and insurance type as covariates. The PAF for individual conditions was displayed graphically using circle plots, where the relative size of the circles indicate the relative contribution of each condition within each year for each race/ethnicity (truncated to top 15 conditions). All statistical analyses were conducted in STATA 15 (College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC).

Results

Our data included 123,613,970 unique hospitalizations between 1993 and 2012. Over time, the average age of hospitalized patients increased (Table 1). The earliest 5-year block (1993–1997) found that the average proportion of hospitalized patients aged 45–64 was 22.3%, but this increased to 29.2% in the latest 5-year block (2008–2012). There was generally no major change in the sex of hospitalized patients during the observation period. The proportion of patients who received Medicare or Medicaid increased slightly during the 20-year period, with an increase of 3.9% and 2.3% respectively. In contrast, the proportion of privately insured hospitalized patients decreased by 6.6%. The racial/ethnic distribution also changed over the 20-year period with a decrease in the overall proportion of White hospitalized patients and increases in all other racial/ethnic groups, most notably in Hispanic populations (Figures S1-4). The prevalence of uncomplicated hypertension increased the most of all chronic conditions (+ 21.1%) over the 20-years, followed by depression (+ 11.0%), renal failure (+ 10.4%), and chronic pulmonary disease (+ 9.9%). Conversely, AIDS/HIV, metastatic cancer, and solid tumors without metastasis all decreased over the 20-year period.

Table 1 Changes in demographic and clinical characteristics over time
Full size table

Prevalence of multimorbidity and trends in individual chronic conditions by race/ethnicity

The prevalence of multimorbidity increased in all racial/ethnic groups, particularly in White, Black, and Native American populations which saw relative increases of + 29.4%, + 29.7%, and + 32.0% between 1993 and 2012 respectively (Table 2). Hispanic and Asian or Pacific Islander populations also exhibited an increase in the prevalence of multimorbidity over this period (23.0% and 23.5%, respectively). As of 2012, the overall prevalence of multimorbidity was 54.8% for Blacks, 52.8% for Whites, 50.4% for Native Americans, 39.2% for Hispanics, and 38.0% for Asian or Pacific Islanders.

Table 2 Demographic and clinical characteristics, by race/ethnicity
Full size table

With respect to individual chronic conditions, uncomplicated hypertension had the largest relative increase in proportion across all groups, particularly among White (+ 22.1%) and Native American (+ 22.0%) hospitalized patients. The relative proportion of hospitalized patients with chronic pulmonary disease, renal failure, complicated hypertension, and heart failure (HF) also increased in all groups. However, the greatest relative increases in these conditions were observed among Black patients (+ 13.4, + 13.1, + 12.8 and + 7.2% respectively). By 2012, Black patients had the highest overall prevalence of renal failure (19.4%), complicated hypertension (19.2%), and heart failure (16.9%). In contrast, White populations had the highest prevalence of hypothyroidism (13.7%) and depression (16.2%) in 2012.

Trends in multimorbidity

The relative proportion of hospitalized patients with 2 or fewer chronic conditions has decreased while the proportion of those with 3 or more has increased (Fig. 1). Further the overall prevalence of multimorbidity increased over the 20-year timeframe for all racial/ethnic groups (Figure S5). Multimorbidity is known to increase with advancing age, and this was demonstrated in our data, however we noted that at all ages, both in 1993 and in 2012, Black hospitalized patients had the highest prevalence of multimorbidity (Fig. 2A and B).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Number of Elixhauser comorbidities, by year

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

A. Percentage of hospitalized patients with multimorbidity in 1993 stratified by age. B. Percentage of hospitalized patients with multimorbidity in 2012 stratified by age

Full size image

Population attributable fraction

Over the 20-year period the relative contribution of uncomplicated hypertension to multimorbidity increased in all race/ethnic groups, particularly among Hispanic hospitalized patients (+ 5.8%), becoming the leading contributor to multimorbidity for all race/ethnic groups (Fig. 3, Table S1 and Table S2). Hispanic hospitalized patients also had the highest PAF values for diabetes without complications (15.0%), diabetes with complication (5.1%), and obesity (5.8%). In fact, over the 20-year period, Hispanic hospitalized patients were the only group that experienced an increase in the contribution of diabetes without complication (+ 0.9%).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Population attributable fraction for multimorbidity (i.e., the relative influence of individual morbidities on the outcome of multimorbidity) by year and race/ethnicity

Full size image

The contribution of depression to multimorbidity was highest for White hospitalized patients (7.0%), and lowest among Asian/Pacific Islanders (3.4%). The contribution of drug abuse to multimorbidity affected Black hospitalized patients (3.8%) and Hispanic hospitalized patients (3.3%) the most despite its contribution decreasing over time in these groups (-2.6% and − 2.4% respectively). Conversely, the contribution of drug abuse to multimorbidity increased among White hospitalized patients by 0.3%. We also saw large increases in the PAF for renal failure across all groups, though the largest relative changes were observed in Hispanic (+ 4.4%) and Asian/Pacific Islander (+ 4.5%) populations. The PAF for HF and cardiac arrhythmias decreased substantially for all groups, but most among White (-14.5% and − 8.4%, respectively) and least among Black populations (-8.8% and − 3.0%, respectively). (Table S1).

Discussion

Our study explored trends and patterns in multimorbidity by race/ethnicity over a 20-year period (1993–2012) among hospitalized patients in the US. We were able to describe trends in the prevalence of multimorbidity as well as individual disease contributions to multimorbidity, stratified by race/ethnicity. Our study adds to the multimorbidity literature by highlighting racial/ethnic variations in multimorbidity trends, and more uniquely, highlighting changes in specific chronic disease contributions among hospitalized populations. Overall, we determined that (1) from 1993 to 2012, secular increases in the prevalence of multimorbidity have differed by race/ethnicity; (2) Black hospitalized patients continued to have a higher prevalence of multimorbidity compared to all other race/ethnic groups; (3) the contribution of cardiometabolic diseases to multimorbidity has increased, particularly among Hispanic patients; and (4) regardless of race/ethnicity, the prevalence of HF has increased while its contribution to multimorbidity has decreased. Our findings provide insight into the differential patterns of chronic conditions that contribute to multimorbidity across racial/ethnic communities in the United States. This is particularly important as many of the leading contributors to multimorbidity (e.g., obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and their related complications) are modifiable and potentially preventable through individual education, modifications to environments and opportunities to promote overall health [41,42,43].

The major increase in the prevalence of multimorbidity over time (irrespective of race/ethnic) amongst hospitalized patients is consistent with previous studies that have demonstrated similar trends in the general US population [44]. However, we also examined the relative contribution of individual conditions to multimorbidity which can help inform disease-targeted preventative strategies for specific conditions in the general population and in at-risk racial/ethnic groups. For example, across all groups we observed an increase in the prevalence of uncomplicated hypertension, fluid and electrolyte disorders, chronic pulmonary disease, diabetes without complication, obesity, and renal failure. From our PAF-analysis, we also determined that these chronic conditions generally had some of the highest contributions to multimorbidity. The fact that these conditions are highly prevalent and increasing over time, likely contributed to the increase in multimorbidity during the 20-year period. The racial/ethnic variations in the prevalence of individual conditions also explains the differences in multimorbidity estimates by race/ethnicity. Focused initiatives should be implemented to reduce exposure to the modifiable risk-factors associated with these highly prevalent conditions. It is also crucial to include members of the affected communities in the development, implementation, and evaluation of such initiatives as community participation has been shown to lead to programs and policies that are more likely to improve outcomes [45].

Consistent with previous studies within the general population, we found that Black hospitalized patients had a higher prevalence of multimorbidity compared to all other race/ethnic groups [12, 46]. Previous studies have attributed these disparities to the socioeconomic and structural inequities faced by the Black population. We found evidence of this as Black and Hispanic hospitalized patients had the highest prevalence of Medicaid – which has been used in previous studies as a proxy for individual SES [47,48,49]. Furthermore, many Black neighborhoods in the U.S predispose individuals to greater levels of poverty, environmental and psychosocial stress, higher rates of food insecurity, limited access to a healthy diet, and lower quality health care [50, 51]. These environmental conditions are the product of a history of systemic exclusion and discrimination of Black Americans that have prevented them from achieving social, material, and economic control [52]. Therefore, these upstream inequities have predisposed Black Americans to otherwise preventable conditions (e.g., obesity, diabetes, hypertension, etc.) much earlier in their life-course. Such predispositions and sustained inequities have also been associated with worse health outcomes later in life [53, 54]. To address the disparities of multimorbidity among Black hospitalized patients, it is imperative to also address the upstream socioeconomic inequities associated with adverse health outcomes. If these social determinants are not addressed, Black populations in the U.S. will continue to face more adverse health outcomes.

We also found that the contribution of cardiometabolic diseases has increased significantly across all race/ethnic groups, particularly among Hispanic hospitalized patients. Despite having the second lowest prevalence of multimorbidity, Hispanic patients had the greatest contribution from diabetes, hypertension, and obesity. Distinctly, the contribution of diabetes without complication has decreased in all race/ethnic groups with the exception of Hispanic hospitalized patients. Previous studies have also described higher rates of metabolic conditions among Hispanics [55, 56]. Our findings suggest that multimorbidity among Hispanic patients may be attributed to a higher susceptibility to these particular conditions. Therefore, Hispanic populations may significantly benefit from preventive programs aimed at cardiometabolic risk factors to ultimately reduce the risk of multimorbidity [42, 43, 57].

Consistent with previous studies, we saw an overall increase in the prevalence of HF amongst hospitalized patients [58, 59]. This could be attributed to the rise of other non-HF comorbidities, resulting in more medically complex HF patients [60]. This is supported by our PAF analysis which indicates that while the contribution of HF has decreased, the contributions of conditions such as obesity, hypertension, and renal failure has substantially increased. This decrease in the relative HF-contribution to multimorbidity is most likely due to improvements in clinical management of coronary artery disease (CAD) and HF that have reduced the overall incidence/prevalence of severe HF [61]. However, it is also important to note that the decrease in HF contribution was not equal across all racial/ethnic groups. Our findings show that while White hospitalized patients experienced the greatest reduction in HF contribution to multimorbidity, Black hospitalized patients experienced the least. Additionally, Black hospitalized patients went from having the lowest HF-contribution in 1993, to having the highest in 2012. This finding supports previous studies that show Black populations experience higher prevalence and worse outcomes of HF compared to White population [62, 63]. Such racial/ethnic differences may be due to variations in clinical decision-making, insurance coverage, and access to appropriate treatments [64, 65].

There are several strengths of our study. First, this study quantitatively describes, over a 20-year period, the contribution of individual chronic conditions to the burden of multimorbidity in hospitalized patients by race/ethnicity, which is a valuable addition to the existing literature. Second, past multimorbidity studies on race/ethnicity typically only consider White, Black, and sometimes Hispanic populations, while often ignoring or combining Asian/Pacific Islander and Native American populations into another racial/ethnic category often due of issues of small sample sizes within these populations [22, 46, 66,67,68]. However, the NIS is an administrative database designed to be representative of all non-federal community hospitals in the US and provides large sample sizes that allow for in-depth and granular analyses across diverse racial/ethnic groups.

However, our study should be interpreted in light of its limitations. As with any administrative database that relies on coded hospital information, the NIS is susceptible to misclassification and/or changes in coding practices over time. Therefore, the increase in multimorbidity could be a function of systematic up-coding within hospital data. However, the NIS provides trend weights to account for temporal variations in coding practice to allow for year-to-year comparisons. While our analysis does not include more contemporary data, there were important changes to the NIS sampling strategy after 2012 that would result in spurious changes to prevalence estimates within studies reporting trends over time [69]. It is also important to note that our study was limited to hospitalized patient samples, therefore our findings can only be generalized to hospital settings due to the differences in the types of comorbidities prevalent between hospitalized patients and outpatients. Furthermore, with administrative data, the more health care encounters a patient has, the more likely they are to accrue diagnoses that will apply to future encounters. Therefore, our analyses may underestimate the true level of multimorbidity for marginalized groups (e.g., racial/ethnic minorities) with less access to care. While the Affordable Care Act (i.e., Obamacare) did expand coverage to those who were previously uninsured (which have over-representation from racial/ethnic minorities), this program was enacted in 2010 and wide coverage was not made available until a few years after [70]. Finally, we recognize that race may be a poor surrogate for other complex social constructs [71, 72] and may not fully capture the heterogeneity in the social, political, economic, and environmental circumstances between and within the defined racial/ethnic groups. However, the deep historical context of race and its impact on contemporary institutions within the United States, make it a critical variable to measure in order to understand the health inequities present within health care and medical research.

In summary, our study highlights the growing burden of multimorbidity among hospitalized populations in the United States and how this has changed differentially across 5 different racial/ethnic groups over a 20-year period. We were also able to identify individual chronic conditions that contribute differently to the construct of multimorbidity across racial/ethnic groups. These findings further elucidate the racial/ethnic gaps prevalent in multimorbidity within the United States. It also provides insight into the unique health inequalities faced by different racial/ethnic communities.

Data Availability

We are not able to make our data set available to other researchers due to our contractual arrangements with the data custodian (US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality). Requests for similar data sources can be made at: https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/tech_assist/centdist.jsp.

References

  1. Menotti A, Mulder I, Nissinen A, Giampaoli S, Feskens EJ, Kromhout D. Prevalence of morbidity and multimorbidity in elderly male populations and their impact on 10-year all-cause mortality: the FINE study (Finland, Italy, Netherlands, Elderly). J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54(7):680–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Loza E, Jover JA, Rodriguez L, Carmona L, Group ES. Multimorbidity: prevalence, effect on quality of life and daily functioning, and variation of this effect when one condition is a rheumatic disease. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2009;38(4):312–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Huntley AL, Johnson R, Purdy S, Valderas JM, Salisbury C. Measures of multimorbidity and morbidity burden for use in primary care and community settings: a systematic review and guide. Ann Fam Med. 2012;10(2):134–41.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Greenfield S, Apolone G, McNeil BJ, Cleary PD. The importance of co-existent disease in the occurrence of postoperative complications and one-year recovery in patients undergoing total hip replacement. Comorbidity and outcomes after hip replacement. Med Care. 1993;31(2):141–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nguyen TN, Ngangue P, Haggerty J, Bouhali T, Fortin M. Multimorbidity, polypharmacy and primary prevention in community-dwelling adults in Quebec: a cross-sectional study. Fam Pract. 2019;36(6):706–12.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wolff JL, Starfield B, Anderson G. Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(20):2269–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Caraballo C, Herrin J, Mahajan S, Massey D, Lu Y, Ndumele CD, et al. Temporal Trends in racial and ethnic disparities in Multimorbidity Prevalence in the United States, 1999–2018. Am J Med. 2022;135(9):1083–92e14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bor J, Cohen GH, Galea S. Population health in an era of rising income inequality: USA, 1980–2015. Lancet. 2017;389(10077):1475–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Alshakhs M, Jackson B, Ikponmwosa D, Reynolds R, Madlock-Brown C. Multimorbidity patterns across race/ethnicity as stratified by age and obesity. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):9716.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Frederick CB, Snellman K, Putnam RD. Increasing socioeconomic disparities in adolescent obesity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(4):1338–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Low LL, Kwan YH, Ko MSM, Yeam CT, Lee VSY, Tan WB, et al. Epidemiologic characteristics of Multimorbidity and Sociodemographic factors Associated with Multimorbidity in a rapidly aging asian country. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(11):e1915245.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. St Sauver JL, Boyd CM, Grossardt BR, Bobo WV, Finney Rutten LJ, Roger VL, et al. Risk of developing multimorbidity across all ages in an historical cohort study: differences by sex and ethnicity. BMJ Open. 2015;5(2):e006413.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Violan C, Foguet-Boreu Q, Flores-Mateo G, Salisbury C, Blom J, Freitag M, et al. Prevalence, determinants and patterns of multimorbidity in primary care: a systematic review of observational studies. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(7):e102149.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. van den Akker M, Buntinx F, Metsemakers JF, Roos S, Knottnerus JA. Multimorbidity in general practice: prevalence, incidence, and determinants of co-occurring chronic and recurrent diseases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(5):367–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Violan C, Foguet-Boreu Q, Roso-Llorach A, Rodriguez-Blanco T, Pons-Vigues M, Pujol-Ribera E, et al. Burden of multimorbidity, socioeconomic status and use of health services across stages of life in urban areas: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:530.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lenzi J, Avaldi VM, Rucci P, Pieri G, Fantini MP. Burden of multimorbidity in relation to age, gender and immigrant status: a cross-sectional study based on administrative data. BMJ Open. 2016;6(12):e012812.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Howard VJ, Kleindorfer DO, Judd SE, McClure LA, Safford MM, Rhodes JD, et al. Disparities in stroke incidence contributing to disparities in stroke mortality. Ann Neurol. 2011;69(4):619–27.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Golden SH, Brown A, Cauley JA, Chin MH, Gary-Webb TL, Kim C, et al. Health disparities in endocrine disorders: biological, clinical, and nonclinical factors–an Endocrine Society scientific statement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(9):E1579–639.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gentile NT, Seftchick MW. Poor outcomes in hispanic and african american patients after acute ischemic stroke: influence of diabetes and hyperglycemia. Ethn Dis. 2008;18(3):330–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ward BW, Schiller JS, Goodman RA. Multiple chronic conditions among US adults: a 2012 update. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014;11:E62.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. He Z, Bian J, Carretta HJ, Lee J, Hogan WR, Shenkman E, et al. Prevalence of multiple chronic conditions among older adults in Florida and the United States: comparative analysis of the OneFlorida Data Trust and National Inpatient Sample. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(4):e137.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang Y, Misra R, Sambamoorthi U. Prevalence of Multimorbidity among asian indian, chinese, and non-hispanic white adults in the United States. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(9).

  23. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, Cushman M, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;131(4):e29–322.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hall HI, Byers RH, Ling Q, Espinoza L. Racial/ethnic and age disparities in HIV prevalence and disease progression among men who have sex with men in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(6):1060–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. HCUP. National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Healthcare cost and utilization project (HCUP). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  26. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The strengthening the reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(8):573–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bhopal R. Glossary of terms relating to ethnicity and race: for reflection and debate. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58(6):441–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yudell M, Roberts D, DeSalle R, Tishkoff S. SCIENCE AND SOCIETY. Taking race out of human genetics. Science. 2016;351(6273):564–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fortin M, Stewart M, Poitras ME, Almirall J, Maddocks H. A systematic review of prevalence studies on multimorbidity: toward a more uniform methodology. Ann Fam Med. 2012;10(2):142–51.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee YAJ, Xie Y, Lee PSS, Lee ES. Comparing the prevalence of multimorbidity using different operational definitions in primary care in Singapore based on a cross-sectional study using retrospective, large administrative data. BMJ Open. 2020;10(12):e039440.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Storeng SH, Vinjerui KH, Sund ER, Krokstad S. Associations between complex multimorbidity, activities of daily living and mortality among older Norwegians. A prospective cohort study: the HUNT Study, Norway. BMC Geriatr. 2020;20(1):21.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Harrison C, Britt H, Miller G, Henderson J. Examining different measures of multimorbidity, using a large prospective cross-sectional study in australian general practice. BMJ Open. 2014;4(7):e004694.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998;36(1):8–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Menendez ME, Neuhaus V, van Dijk CN, Ring D. The Elixhauser comorbidity method outperforms the Charlson index in predicting inpatient death after orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(9):2878–86.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Health Care Cost and Utilization User Support. NIS Description of Data Elements: SEX - Sex of the patient [Available from: https://hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/vars/sex/nisnote.jsp.

  36. Medicaid.gov. The offical U.S. government site for Medicaid 2020 [Available from: https://www.medicaid.gov.

  37. Medicare.gov. The official U.S. government site for Medicare 2020 [Available from: https://www.medicare.gov.

  38. Health Care Cost and Utilization User Support. NIS Description of Data Elements: PAY1 - Expected primary payer, uniform [Available from: https://hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/vars/pay1/nisnote.jsp.

  39. Zou G. A modified Poisson Regression Approach to prospective studies with Binary Data. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(7):702–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Barros AJD, Hirakata VN. Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3(1):21.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Chrysi MS, Michopoulos I, Dimitriadis G, Peppa M. A modern web-based health promotion program for patients in Greece with diabetes 2 and obesity: an interventional study. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):639.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mullen KA, Manuel DG, Hawken SJ, Pipe AL, Coyle D, Hobler LA, et al. Effectiveness of a hospital-initiated smoking cessation programme: 2-year health and healthcare outcomes. Tob Control. 2017;26(3):293–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Richardson AS, Zutshi R, Nguyen P, Tysinger B, Sturm R. Microsimulation projections of obesity interventions on cardiometabolic health disparities in the United States. Obes (Silver Spring). 2022;30(1):62–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. King DE, Xiang J, Pilkerton CS. Multimorbidity Trends in United States adults, 1988–2014. J Am Board Fam Med. 2018;31(4):503–13.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Haldane V, Chuah FLH, Srivastava A, Singh SR, Koh GCH, Seng CK, et al. Community participation in health services development, implementation, and evaluation: a systematic review of empowerment, health, community, and process outcomes. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(5):e0216112.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Quinones AR, Botoseneanu A, Markwardt S, Nagel CL, Newsom JT, Dorr DA, et al. Racial/ethnic differences in multimorbidity development and chronic disease accumulation for middle-aged adults. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(6):e0218462.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Shen JJ, Wan TT, Perlin JB. An exploration of the complex relationship of socioecologic factors in the treatment and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction in disadvantaged populations. Health Serv Res. 2001;36(4):711–32.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Harnick DJ, Cohen JL, Schechter CB, Fuster V, Smith DA. Effects of practice setting on quality of lipid-lowering management in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1998;81(12):1416–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Foraker RE, Rose KM, Whitsel EA, Suchindran CM, Wood JL, Rosamond WD. Neighborhood socioeconomic status, Medicaid coverage and medical management of myocardial infarction: atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) community surveillance. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:632.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Williams DR, Collins C. Racial residential segregation: a fundamental cause of racial disparities in health. Public Health Rep. 2001;116(5):404–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Coleman-Jensen A, Rabbitt MP, Gregory CA, Singh A. Household Food Security in the United States in 2016. United States Department of Agriculture; 2017.

  52. Williams DR, Priest N, Anderson NB. Understanding associations among race, socioeconomic status, and health: patterns and prospects. Health Psychol. 2016;35(4):407–11.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Diez Roux AV, Mair C. Neighborhoods and health. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1186:125–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Chan MS, van den Hout A, Pujades-Rodriguez M, Jones MM, Matthews FE, Jagger C, et al. Socio-economic inequalities in life expectancy of older adults with and without multimorbidity: a record linkage study of 1.1 million people in England. Int J Epidemiol. 2019;48(4):1340–51.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Quinones AR, Liang J, Ye W. Differences in diabetes mellitus onset for older Black, White, and Mexican Americans. Ethn Dis. 2013;23(3):310–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Heiss G, Snyder ML, Teng Y, Schneiderman N, Llabre MM, Cowie C, et al. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome among Hispanics/Latinos of diverse background: the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(8):2391–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Parker AR, Byham-Gray L, Denmark R, Winkle PJ. The effect of medical nutrition therapy by a registered dietitian nutritionist in patients with prediabetes participating in a randomized controlled clinical research trial. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014;114(11):1739–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Fang J, Mensah GA, Croft JB, Keenan NL. Heart failure-related hospitalization in the U.S., 1979 to 2004. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(6):428–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Heidenreich PA, Albert NM, Allen LA, Bluemke DA, Butler J, Fonarow GC, et al. Forecasting the impact of heart failure in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Heart Fail. 2013;6(3):606–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Sharma A, Zhao X, Hammill BG, Hernandez AF, Fonarow GC, Felker GM, et al. Trends in Noncardiovascular Comorbidities among Patients hospitalized for heart failure: insights from the get with the Guidelines-Heart failure Registry. Circ Heart Fail. 2018;11(6):e004646.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Tsao CW, Lyass A, Enserro D, Larson MG, Ho JE, Kizer JR, et al. Temporal Trends in the incidence of and Mortality Associated with Heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction. JACC Heart Fail. 2018;6(8):678–85.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Nayak A, Hicks AJ, Morris AA. Understanding the complexity of heart failure risk and treatment in Black Patients. Circ Heart Fail. 2020;13(8):e007264.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Lewis EF, Claggett B, Shah AM, Liu J, Shah SJ, Anand I, et al. Racial differences in characteristics and outcomes of patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction in the treatment of preserved cardiac function heart failure trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2018;11(3):e004457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Breathett K, Yee E, Pool N, Hebdon M, Crist JD, Knapp S, et al. Does race influence decision making for Advanced Heart failure therapies? J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(22):e013592.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Lewsey SC, Breathett K. Racial and ethnic disparities in heart failure: current state and future directions. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2021;36(3):320–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Holland AT, Palaniappan LP. Problems with the collection and interpretation of asian-american health data: omission, aggregation, and extrapolation. Ann Epidemiol. 2012;22(6):397–405.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Goins RT, Pilkerton CS. Comorbidity among older american Indians: the native elder care study. J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2010;25(4):343–54.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Kalgotra P, Sharda R, Croff JM. Examining multimorbidity differences across racial groups: a network analysis of electronic medical records. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):13538.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Healthcare Cost & Utilization Project. Trend Weights For HCUP NIS Data [Available from: https://hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/trendwghts.jsp.

  70. Reisman M. The affordable Care Act, five years later: policies, Progress, and politics. P T. 2015;40(9):575–600.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Ioannidis JPA, Powe NR, Yancy C. Recalibrating the Use of Race in Medical Research. JAMA. 2021;325(7):623–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Flanagin A, Frey T, Christiansen SL, Bauchner H. The reporting of race and ethnicity in Medical and Science Journals: comments invited. JAMA. 2021;325(11):1049–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cumming School of Medicine, Undergraduate Medical Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

    Mursal A. Mohamud

  2. Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

    David J.T. Campbell, James Wick, Alexander A. Leung, Gabriel E. Fabreau & Marcello Tonelli

  3. Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

    David J.T. Campbell, Alexander A. Leung, Gabriel E. Fabreau, Marcello Tonelli & Paul E. Ronksley

  4. Department of Cardiac Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

    David J.T. Campbell

Authors
  1. Mursal A. Mohamud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David J.T. Campbell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James Wick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alexander A. Leung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gabriel E. Fabreau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Marcello Tonelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Paul E. Ronksley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

PER and JW conceived the study, obtained access to the data, generated the cohort, and completed the data analysis. DJTC and MAM provided assistance with interpretation of the analysis. MAM wrote the first draft of the manuscript. DJTC, AAL, GEF, MT, and PER critically revised the manuscript for content and style. All authors approved the final submitted manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul E. Ronksley.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethics approval

As this data is publicly available, protected by law and did not contain patient identifiers, the Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board at the University of Calgary deemed this study exempt from ethics review. This study follows the reporting guidelines outlined within the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement.

Consent for publication

Please see above. Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohamud, M.A., Campbell, D.J., Wick, J. et al. 20-year trends in multimorbidity by race/ethnicity among hospitalized patient populations in the United States. Int J Equity Health 22, 137 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-023-01950-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-023-01950-2

Keywords

International Journal for Equity in Health

ISSN: 1475-9276

Contact us