- Open Access
Erratum to: what potential has tobacco control for reducing health inequalities? The New Zealand situation
International Journal for Equity in Health volume 5, Article number: 16 (2006)
This is a correction article.
In our article  there was an error in the calculation of population attributable risk percents (PAR%) for 1996–99 shown in Table 1 (bottom row). The corrected Table is in this correction article (see Table 1). This correction has also required revising Figure 2 (see Figure 1 in this correction article). In the process of making these corrections, we have extended our presentation of the contribution of smoking to mortality gaps by ethnicity and education to include a more explicit acknowledgement of the choice of counterfactual assumption. Figure 1 now shows the estimated 'never smoker rate' plus the 'smoking attributable rate' for each ethnic and educational group. Note that the 'smoking attributable rate' as a percentage of the total rate is equivalent to the relevant PAR% shown in Table 1. 'A' and 'B' signify two alternative counterfactual scenarios that can be used to estimate the contribution of smoking to ethnic or socioeconomic gaps in mortality. Scenario A for ethnic gaps is whereby the non-Māori non-Pacific (nMnP) population adopt the smoking rates of Māori, calculated using direct standardisation as given elsewhere [ref 27 of the original paper]. Scenario A for education gaps is whereby each educational group is given an 'average' smoking rate, calculated using Poisson regression as given elsewhere [ref 75 of the original paper]. Scenario B is more extreme (and arguably somewhat unrealistic) whereby we assume there had never been smoking in New Zealand, with the area labelled 'B' in Figure 1 being that for Scenario B over and above that for Scenario A. The contribution of smoking to gaps under Scenario B is calculated using standard population attributable rate methods, that is the difference in "attributable smoking rates" between Māori and nMnP or between nil and post-school qualifications. Thus estimating the contribution of smoking to mortality gaps depends on how extreme the counterfactual assumptions are . Halving total population smoking rates, and making smoking rates for all ethnic and socioeconomic groups the same, might (allowing for time lags) close mortality gaps by an amount mid-way between Scenarios A and B shown in Figure 1.
Wilson N, Blakely T, Tobias M: What potential has tobacco control for reducing health inequalities? The New Zealand situation. Int J Equity Health. 2006, 5: 14-10.1186/1475-9276-5-14.
Avendano M: Smoking and inequalities. Lancet. 2006, 368: 1417-1418. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69600-1.
The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1186/1475-9276-5-14
Authors’ original submitted files for images
Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.
About this article
Cite this article
Wilson, N., Blakely, T. & Tobias, M. Erratum to: what potential has tobacco control for reducing health inequalities? The New Zealand situation. Int J Equity Health 5, 16 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-5-16