Skip to content


  • Meeting abstract
  • Open Access

Inequity in health care utilization in Ecuador: an analysis of current issues and potential solutions

International Journal for Equity in HealthThe official journal of the International Society for Equity in Health201211 (Suppl 1) :A6

  • Published:


  • Health Care Service
  • Health Care Utilization
  • Rural Household
  • Public Health Service
  • Socioeconomic Inequality


From an equity perspective, a health system needs to address social, political and economic inequalities that prevent people to achieve higher standards of living and exert their right to health [1, 2]. The 2008 Ecuadorian Constitution guarantees the right to health, an important contributing factor to good living or Sumak Kawsay[3]. The purpose of this study was to analyze socioeconomic inequalities and its relationship to provision of health care services in Ecuador, and to discuss relevant policy alternatives.


Our analysis on social and economic determinants of health care utilization used the 2004 National Demographic and Maternal & Child Health Survey (ENDEMAIN) as the main dataset, which included a representative national population sample. To estimate the effects of social and economic variables on health care utilization, we applied two types of analysis, multilevel multivariate analyses by using MLWiN 2.02, and spatial analyses by using GeoDa 0.9.5 [4].


We found that various layers of social inequalities persist in the Ecuadorian society. Indigenous, low-income, and rural households are particularly limited in their ability to access health care services in Ecuador. Additionally, we explored the influence of migration and remittances in reducing inequalities in health care utilization. We found that having a migrant in the household and receiving remittances improved use of antiparasitic medicines and to a lesser extent curative services, particularly among low-income Ecuadorians. Despite the drastic concentration in urban areas of private and public health care providers, we found that density of public practice health personnel is positively associated with use of preventive and curative care, particularly among rural households.


Our study indicates that major social, economic, and geographic inequalities persist and are associated with access to health care services in Ecuador. Efforts to transform the health care system should go beyond its curative focus to consider an equitable distribution of health care resources and reducing financial and social barriers. These can be best achieved through strengthening government sector public health services, as our study suggest. Further, promoting family and community orientation of services [5, 6], and strengthening spaces for public participation and control [7] are also essential to reduce inequalities in access to health care.



This research was supported in part by a Diversity Fellowship from Western Oregon University and a SYLFF Fellowship for International Research. The funders had no involvement in the preparation of this abstract.

Authors’ Affiliations

Community Health, Western Oregon University, Monmouth, Oregon 97361, USA
International Health Program, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA


  1. Starfield B, Birn A-E: Income redistribution is not enough: income inequality, social welfare programs, and achieving equity in health. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2007, 61 (12): 1038-1041. 10.1136/jech.2006.054627.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Breilh J, Tillería Y: Aceleración global y despojo en el Ecuador: el retroceso del derecho a la salud en la era neoliberal. 2009, Quito: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar - Abya YalaGoogle Scholar
  3. Registro Oficial: Constitución política de la república del Ecuador. 2008Google Scholar
  4. Anselin L: GeoDa™ 0.9 User’s Guide. 2003, Urbana, IL: Center for Spatially Integrated Social ScienceGoogle Scholar
  5. Macinko J, Almeida C, Oliveira EdS, Klingelhoefer de Sá P: Organization and delivery of primary health care services in Petrópolis, Brazil. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management. 2004, 19 (4): 303-317. 10.1002/hpm.766.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Starfield B, Shi L: Policy relevant determinants of health: an international perspective. Health Policy. 2002, 60 (3): 201-218. 10.1016/S0168-8510(01)00208-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Rodríguez C, Lamothe L, Barten F, Haggerty J: Gobernanza y salud: significado y aplicaciones en América Latina. Revista de Salud Pública. 2010, 12 (suppl 1): 151-159.PubMedGoogle Scholar


© Lopez-Cevallos and Chi; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.