Table 2 The influence of SDP on the proportion of individual payment ratio
Medical insurance type | Personal payment ratio (%) | t-value | Prob | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
pre-implementation | post-implementation | |||
panel A: type 2 diabetes | ||||
working staff | 26.60 | 20.00 | 2.804 | 0.014*** |
retired staff | 23.89 | 15.00 | 15.467 | 0.000*** |
urban and rural residents | 34.81 | 35.00 | -2.184 | 0.051 |
panel B: planned cesarean section | ||||
working staff | 31.88 | 20.00 | 17.519 | 0.000*** |
urban and rural residents | 50.37 | 35.00 | 6.523 | 0.000*** |
panel C: Lacunar infarction | ||||
working staff | 28.90 | 20.00 | 10.787 | 0.000*** |
retired staff | 21.85 | 15.00 | 5.438 | 0.000*** |
urban and rural residents | 31.26 | 35.00 | -5.740 | 0.000*** |