Skip to main content

Table 2 Criteria used to select right-to-health indicators

From: Implementing and monitoring the right to health in breast cancer: selection of indicators using a Delphi process

Criterion

Definition

Scientific robustness

Indicators are reliable (i.e., they provide stable results across various populations and circumstances) and valid (i.e., they

measure what they are intended to measure)

Usefulness

Indicators evaluate areas that need improvement and require prioritisation, or right-to-health principles, as opposed to what data are available

Representativeness

Indicators are based on observed data as opposed to estimates from models that rely on assumptions

Understandability

The measures are clear and understandable by policymakers

Importance

Indicators reflect important elements of the right to health or a human rights-based approach to breast cancer

  1. Definitions of these criteria are from E Nolte, M McKee, S Wait. Describing and evaluating health systems. In A Bowling, S Ebrahim (Eds.), Handbook of health research methods, Open University Press, New York (2006), pp. 12–43