Skip to main content

Table 4 Number of Comments per Theme and Subtheme

From: Assessment of immigration law enforcement presence in a teaching hospital along the US/Mexico border

Overarching Theme/Subtheme

Comments (n = 406)

Neutral (%)

254 (62.1)

1. Agents described as cooperative (i.e.: left the room when asked, provided information with prompting, etc.) (%)

71 (17.4)

2. Agents described as benign/just doing their job/neutral (%)

231 (56.5)

Positive (%)

81 (19.8)

3. Positive attribute/quality of agent (%)

68 (16.6)

4. Positive action performed by agent (%)

27 (6.6)

Negative (%)

100 (24.4)

5. Negative attribute/quality of agent (%)

34 (8.3)

6. Negative action performed by agent (%)

46 (11.2)

7. Agents affect patient care (violate HIPAA, practice of shackling, clearance requests, etc.) (%)

71 (17.4)

8. Agent/Agency interferes with my ability to provide care as a provider (%)

31 (7.6)

Hospital Policy (%)

14 (3.4)

9. Mention of Hospital Policies (they affect my ability to provide care as a provider, unsure of what the policies are, etc.) (%)

14 (3.4)

Unrelated (%)

9 (2.2)

10. Respondent upset about survey (%)

3 (7.3)

11. Expression of positive [nationalism] views of law enforcement (“protecting our nation, “securing our border”) (%)

8 (2.0)

Hierarchy & Power Dynamics (%)

42 (10.3)

12. Mention of power dynamics between law enforcement/provider/patient (%)

42 (10.3)

Underinformed (%)

76 (18.6)

13. There appear to be issues with respondent’s self-awareness (describing CBP being used as interpreter, unaware they could have agent leave room, etc.)

35 (8.5)

14. “See previous answer” (%)

14 (3.4)

15. Don’t want to make assumptions/not sure (%)

27 (6.6)