Skip to main content

Table 3 Confidence in knowledge regarding policies related to ILE in the clinical environment:

From: Assessment of immigration law enforcement presence in a teaching hospital along the US/Mexico border

  

Physician/APP

N = 192 (72.2%)

Medical Student

N = 74 (27.8%)

Total

N = 266

1. Hospital policies regarding medical care for detained patients (%)*

Unconfident

78 (40.6)

47 (63.5)

125 (47.0)

Confident

102 (53.1)

20 (27.0)

122 (45.9)

Missing

12 (6.3)

7 (9.5)

19 (7.1)

2. Immigration law enforcement policies regarding medical care for detained patients (%)

Unconfident

96 (50.0)

45 (60.8)

141 (53.1)

Confident

84 (43.8)

22 (29.7)

106 (39.8)

Missing

12 (6.3)

7 (9.5)

19 (7.1)

3. Level of authority of law enforcement in a medical setting (for example: detaining a person in the hospital, jurisdiction within a hospital) (%)

Unconfident

90 (46.9)

45 (60.8)

135 (50.8)

Confident

90 (46.9)

22 (29.7)

112 (42.1)

Missing

12 (6.3)

7 (9.5)

19 (7.1)

4. Level to which law enforcement can be involved in patient care (for example: being present during medical exams, filling out patient forms, interpreting) (%)

Unconfident

82 (42.7)

41 (55.4)

123 (46.2)

Confident

98 (51.0)

26 (35.1)

124 (46.6)

Missing

12 (6.3)

7 (9.5)

19 (7.1)

5. Rights of patients who are in immigration law enforcement (for example: to make a personal phone call, HIPAA protections) (%)

Unconfident

89 (46.3)

42 (56.8)

131 (49.2)

Confident

89 (46.3)

25 (33.8)

114 (42.9)

Missing

14 (7.3)

7 (9.5)

21 (7.9)

6. Rights of providers of patients in immigration law enforcement (for example: asking an agent to leave a patient’s room, soliciting legal or social services for the patient) (%)

Unconfident

83 (43.2)

40 (54.1)

123 (46.2)

Confident

96 (50.0)

27 (36.5)

123 (46.2)

Missing

13 (6.8)

7 (9.5)

20 (7.5)

  1. *Chi-squared test between medical student and physician/APP group responses had p < 0.001