Table 2 Quantitative results for applicability, usability, and desirability questionnaire by career level, sex/gender expertise, and research field
Career level | Expertise in sex and gender health research | Research field | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total (n = 31) | Junior (n = 19) | Mid (n = 4) | Senior (n = 8) | Yes (n = 7) | No (n = 24) | Pre-clin/basic (n = 5) | Clinical (n = 19) | Public health (n = 17) | |
Applicability | |||||||||
A1 (quiz triggered knowledge) | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 3.6 | 4.3 | 3.8 | 4.3 | 4.2 |
A2 (quiz made me think) | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 3.9 | 3.3 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 3.8 |
A3 (easy to move through quiz) | 4.5 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4.8 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.6 | 4.5 |
A4 (organization resources good) | 4.0 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 4.2 | 3.9 |
A5 (research phases comprehensive) | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.2 |
A6 (useful resources) | 4.0 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
A7 (resources new) | 3.8 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 3.1 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 3.4 |
A8 (resources enough information) | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 4.2 |
A9 (overall applicability) | 7.8 | 7.7 | 7.3 | 8.4 | 8.0 | 7.8 | 7.8 | 8.1 | 7.7 |
Usability | |||||||||
U1 (access quick and intuitive) | 4.3 | 4.3 | 3.8 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.8 | 4.2 | 4.2 |
U2 (website easy on eyes) | 4.0 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 3.9 | 4.6 | 4.1 | 3.8 |
U3 (start instructions clear) | 3.8 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 4.4 | 3.6 | 4.2 | 3.4 | 3.8 |
U4 (quickly found information) | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.8 | 3.6 | 3.3 | 3.6 | 4.4 | 3.4 | 3.4 |
U5 (became familiar quickly) | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.1 |
U6 (easy to use) | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.1 | 4.4 | 5.0 | 4.3 | 4.2 |
U7 (functions well integrated) | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.9 |
U8 (information text clear) | 4.0 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
U9 (information text appropriate) | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4.2 |
U10 (terminology understandable) | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.4 |
U11 (application device-friendly) | 4.3 | 4.2 | 3.8 | 4.8 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.2 |
U12 (enjoyed use) | 4.3 | 4.4 | 3.5 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.0 |
U13 (overall usability) | 7.8 | 7.7 | 7.3 | 8.3 | 8.1 | 7.7 | 8.4 | 7.8 | 7.6 |
Desirability | |||||||||
D1 (innovative) | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.3 |
D2 (interesting design) | 4.2 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 3.9 |
D3 (fun presentation) | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.6 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.1 |
D4 (aesthetics improved experience) | 4.1 | 4.1 | 3.8 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.0 |
D5 (functional for researcher) | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.3 |
D6 (matches preferences for searching) | 4.0 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 3.4 | 4.3 | 4.0 |
D7 (feasible in time want to spend) | 4.0 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.3 | 4.3 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 4.1 |
D8 (useful for all levels of experience) | 4.0 | 3.9 | 4.3 | 4.7 | 4.3 | 3.9 | 3.2 | 4.1 | 4.2 |
D9 (relevant resource) | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.7 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.4 |
D10 (overall desirability) | 8.3 | 8.2 | 8.3 | 8.8 | 8.1 | 8.4 | 8.4 | 8.4 | 8.3 |