Skip to main content

Table 4 Horizontal inequity and reranking of the Chinese urban health care financing system in 2002

From: What can we learn from China’s health insurance reform to improve the horizontal equity of healthcare financing?

Decile

Equivalent household expenditure

General taxes

Social insurance contributions

Private insurance premiums

OOP

Total

1—poorest

2.15%

2.18%

0.51%

0.03%

1.87%

1.60%

2

3.36%

3.40%

1.43%

1.35%

3.05%

2.77%

3

4.49%

4.56%

1.52%

1.42%

3.91%

3.50%

4

5.29%

5.34%

3.18%

1.95%

4.28%

4.01%

5

6.29%

6.34%

4.92%

6.62%

5.07%

5.20%

6

8.44%

8.43%

9.50%

8.51%

8.64%

8.71%

7

9.87%

9.88%

10.91%

14.32%

9.07%

9.67%

8

11.87%

11.76%

19.96%

12.74%

11.55%

12.49%

9

15.42%

15.36%

18.50%

21.05%

16.65%

17.14%

10—richest

32.81%

32.76%

29.57%

31.99%

35.91%

34.91%

total

100.00%

100.00%

100.00%

100.00%

100.00%

100.00%

g

 

0.003158

0.015288

0.011513

0.121500

0.151458

V

 

0.000011

0.001176

0.001101

0.007360

0.010280

H

 

0.000019

0.000246

0.000509

0.003933

0.004531

R

 

0.000000

0.000029

0.000538

0.005632

0.006204

RE

 

—0.000008

0.000901

0.000054

—0.002204

—0.000454

RE / RE

 

100.00%

100.00%

100.00%

100.00%

100.00%

V / RE

 

—148.01%

130.57%

2025.36%

—333.95%

—2264.02%

H / RE

 

—247.99%

27.36%

936.09%

—178.43%

—997.83%

R / RE

 

0.00%

3.22%

989.25%

—255.51%

—1366.18%

  1. OOP out-of-pocket payment
  2. g Payments as fraction of income
  3. V Vertical effect
  4. H Horizontal inequity
  5. R Reranking
  6. RE Redistributive effect