Skip to main content

Table.3 Indirect effects between SEP, the mediators and physical performance in the total sample and across cohorts

From: Changes in the role of explanatory factors for socioeconomic inequalities in physical performance: a comparative study of three birth cohorts

 

28/37-cohort

38/47-cohort

48/57-cohort

Behavioural factors

Beta

95% CI

Beta

95% CI

 

Beta

95% CI

 

Via smoking

0.002C

-0.003

0.008

0.004

-0.004

0.012

0.019A

0.004

0.034

Via binge alcohol use

-0.001C

-0.040

0.028

0.001

-0.027

0.036

0.044A

0.005

0.083

Via physical activity

0.001

-0.005

0.006

0.006

-0.004

0.016

0.001

-0.005

0.007

Via BMI

0.017

0.002

0.032

0.014

0.002

0.025

0.028

0.011

0.044

Social factors

         

Via divorce

0.002

-0.017

0.022

-0.002

-0.013

0.010

0.007

-0.006

0.020

Via network size

0.014

0.004

0.024

0.008

-0.003

0.019

0.012

0.000

0.024

Via network complexity

0.001

-0.006

0.009

0.001

-0.004

0.006

-0.009

-0.019

0.001

Via instrumental support

0.000

-0.003

0.002

0.004

-0.002

0.010

-0.004

-0.010

0.002

Via emotional support

0.011C

0.002

0.021

0.011

-0.003

0.025

0.031A

0.016

0.046

Psychological factors

         

Via crystallized intelligence

0.044

-0.006

0.095

0.033

-0.025

0.091

0.002

-0.050

0.054

Via mastery

0.014B,C

0.008

0.030

0.055A

0.034

0.075

0.039A

0.020

0.058

Via self-efficacy

0.023

0.008

0.038

0.042

0.022

0.062

0.052

0.030

0.074

Via neuroticism

0.016

0.003

0.028

0.030

0.014

0.046

0.026

0.012

0.040

  1. Note. Adjusted for age and sex, A = different from 28/37-cohort, B = different from 38/47-cohort, C = different from 48/57-cohort