Skip to main content

Table 6 Attitudes and treatment during Ebola

From: The Ebola crisis and people with disabilities’ access to healthcare and government services in Liberia

 

A few, or many, cases of Ebola (n=560)

No Ebola cases (n=1343)

Don’t know whether there were any

Ebola cases (n=107)

 

Disabled household n (%)

Non-disabled household n (%)

Total

n (%)

Disabled household

n (%)

Non-disabled household n (%) (reference group)

Total n (%)

Disabled household

n (%)

Non-disabled household

n (%)

Total

n (%)

During the Ebola outbreak, did your community change how they acted towards anyone/any groups of people?

 Yes (who and how described below)

206 (78%)**

96 (33%)**

302 (55%)

338 (51%)**

150 (23%)

488 (37%)

23 (55%)**

6 (9%)

29 (27%)

 No

59 (22%) ††

192 (67%) ††

251 (45%)

321 (49%) ††

511 (77%)

832 (63%)

19 (45%) ††

58 (91%)

77 (73%)

Which groups of people were treated differently?

 Orphaned children whose parents died because of Ebola

149 (73%)**

37 (38%)

186 (62%)

119 (35%)

86 (57%)

205 (42%)

3 (13%)

2 (33%)

5 (17%)

 Relatives of people who died because of Ebola

24 (12%)**

15 (15%)**

39 (13%)

16 (5%)

4 (3%)

20 (4%)

1 (4%)

1 (17%)

2 (7%)

 Survivors of Ebola

14 (7%)**

18 (19%)**

32 (11%)

18 (5%)

7 (5%)

25 (5%)

8 (35%)**

1 (17%)

9 (31%)

 Relatives of survivors of Ebola

0 (0%)

21 (22%)**

21 (7%)

3 (1%)

4 (3%)

7 (1%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

 Health workers

5 (2%)

1 (1%)

6 (2%)

26 (8%)

19 (13%)

45 (9%)

2 (9%)

0 (0%)

2 (7%)

 Persons with disabilities

7 (3%)*

0 (0%)

7 (2%)

89 (26%)**

1 (1%)

90 (18%)

3 (13%)*

0 (0%)

3 (10%)

 Sick people

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

21 (6%)

0 (0%)

21 (4%)

4 (17%)

0 (0%)

4 (14%)

How were they treated differently?

 They were not allowed to return home

94 (46%)**

28 (29%)

122 (41%)

97 (28%)

85 (58%)

182 (37%)

2 (9%)

1 (25%)

3 (11%)

 They were isolated in the community

72 (35%)**

24 (25%)**

96 (32%)

90 (26%)**

13 (9%)

103 (21%)

7 (30%)**

2 (50%)

9 (33%)

 They were treated as an outsider

23 (11%)**

10 (10%)**

33 (11%)

61 (18%)**

3 (2%)

32 (7%)

12 (52%)**

0 (0%)

12 (44%)

 They were rejected and shunned by others or treated as inferior

4 (2%)

4 (4%)

8 (3%)

29 (9%)**

3 (2%)

32 (7%)

1 (4%)

0 (0%)

1 (4%)

 They were not treated fairly

6 (3%)

22 (23%)

28 (9%)

28 (8%)

22 (15%)

50 (10%)

0 (0%)

1 (25%)

1 (4%)

  1. ** p<0.0005 *p<0.005 significant increase in odds †† p<0.0005 †p<0.005 decrease in odds of outcome compared to reference group of Non-disabled households in no Ebola cases area, in multi-level mixed effects logistic regression adjusting for age, sex, education, and wealth quintile and clustering by village