Skip to main content

Table 3 Prevalence of social exclusion and other social factors by city (weighted percentagesa)

From: The cumulation of ill health and low agency in socially excluded city dwellers in the Netherlands: how to better identify high-risk/high-need population segments with public health survey data

 

Amsterdam

Rotterdam

The Hague

Utrecht

TOTAL

Social Exclusion

 SEI-HS index

  Moderate to strong

8.1

12.0

13.8

7.1

10.3

  Some or no

91.9

88.0

86.2

92.9

89.7

Social Risk Factors

 Educational level (self-reported) b

  Low

7.4

11.9

9.5

6.9

9.0

  Not low

92.6

88.1

90.5

93.1

91.0

 Standardised annual household incomec

  Low: <  16,100 euro

26.0

25.4

22.1

23.8

24.7

  Not low

74.0

74.6

77.9

76.2

75.3

 Labour market position

  Low: unemployed, disabled, on social assistance

12.8

16.7

15.5

10.3

14.1

  Not low

87.2

83.3

84.5

89.7

85.9

 Migration background

  Native Dutch

49.5

52.3

48.7

68.7

52.9

  Western migration background

18.2

12.1

17.0

11.2

15.3

  Non-Western migration background

32.2

35.6

34.3

20.1

31.8

  1. a Sampling weights were calculated by Statistics Netherlands based on a linear model with 9 sociodemographic variables and their interaction terms [28]
  2. b Low: no or elementary schooling (PO); Not low: general secondary education, primary vocational education (MAVO, LBO); higher secondary education, secondary vocational training (HAVO, VWO, MBO); higher professional education and university (HBO, WO)
  3. c For this question, multiple answers were possible. The answers were categorised hierarchically with” > 20 h/week paid labour” first, followed by” 1–20 h/week paid labour” and” retired”. Those who checked “I am unemployed/job-seeking”, “I am disabled for work” or “I am on social assistance” and did not check one of the former three categories were classified as” unemployed, disabled, on social assistance”. The remaining respondents who checked “I am housewife/man” or “I am studying” were classified as “housewife/man or student”. Those considered “unemployed, disabled, on social assistance” were subsequently classified as low, and the remaining categories were classified as not low