Skip to main content

Table 3 Quality assessment – Quantitative or mixed-methods tool - Migrants

From: Transnational social networks, health, and care: a systematic narrative literature review

Reference
Number
Study (n = 5) Clear, explicit and appropriate aim Clearly described context Sampling approach appropriate and non-biased Sample size adequate Data generation tools well described and appropriate Analysis approach well described and appropriate Findings adequately supported by data (not over-stated) Consideration of limitations, bias and generalizability evident Key concepts relating to migration/ ethnicity are explicit Summary assessment
[30] Baquero, 2010 + + + + + + + ***
[31] Hanley, Gravel, Lippel and Koo, 2014 + *
[32] May, 1992 + + + + + + **
[33] Murphy and Mahalingam, 2004 + + + + + **
[34] Plaza and Plaza, 2019 + + + + + + **
  1. Assessment: + (sufficient) and – (insufficient)
  2. Summary assessment: *Low (< 4 components assessed as sufficient), **Moderate (4–6 components assessed as sufficient), and ***Good (7–9 components assessed as sufficient)