Domain | Sample Problem | Potential Solutions |
---|---|---|
HTA Paradigms | ||
Assembly | Priority-setting: • Manufacturer-driven process, minimal incentive for paediatric submissions | Transition from ‘push’ to ‘pull’ system for technology assembly: • National priority-setting framework • Resources for public sector-initiated HTA submissions • Patient/public engagement on social values to guide priority-setting |
Assessment | Evidence appraisal: • Structural barriers to RCT-level evidence in paediatrics | Innovative trial design and evidence appraisal: • Basket trials, n-of-1 trials • Real-world evidence and performance-based funding mechanisms • Child health expertise in HTA bodies |
Economic evaluation: • Weak incorporation of child-specific considerations (developmental trajectory, preference elicitation) in pharmacoeconomic models | Advancement of science on child health economic evaluation: • Child-centred preference elicitation, family utility generation • Research on public preferences for resource allocation to children, including inquiry into life-course QALY weights | |
Integration | • Poor integration across phases and sectors involved in drug regulation and reimbursement | • Adaptive pathways approach to drug development, market access, and iterative evidence appraisal • Ring-fenced funding for paediatric drugs and health technologies • Engagement with child health experts throughout drug life-cycle |
Sociopolitical Context | ||
Markets | • Weak industry incentives for paediatric drug development and licensing | • Federal regulatory mechanisms to incentivize/compel development and submission of paediatric clinical data • Public funding to subsidize novel drug trials in children |
Governance | • Lack of formal paediatric indications, widespread off-label prescribing • Vertical and horizontal system fragmentation | • Dedicated paediatric expertise and resources within federal regulator and HTA bodies • Improved system integration along pharmaceutical value chain • National framework for drug regulation and funding for children to drive policy harmonization |
Politics | • Weak political voice for children • Politically charged funding environment | • Enhanced receptors for child and family perspectives in drug regulation and funding decisions • Child-specific HTA framework to drive transparency and legitimacy in paediatric technology assessments, and mitigate potential for politically motivated drug funding decisions |