Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Table 1 Restrictiveness of abortion laws and reproductive health indicators

From: The access paradox: abortion law, policy and practice in Ethiopia, Tanzania and Zambia

Country Zambia Ethiopia Tanzania
Restrictiveness of the abortion law* Abortion allowed to preserve physical or mental health and socio-economic reasons Abortion allowed to secure maternal health and on grounds related to age and capacity to take care of a child Abortion severely restricted and only legal to save the life of the mother
Maternal mortality ratio 224 353 398
Fertility rate** 4.9 4.1 5.0
Contraceptive prevalence girls 15–19*** 28.1 8.9 14.9
Contraceptive prevalence 15–49*** 40.8 28.3 34.4
Unmet need for family planning*** 26.6 26.3 25.3
  1. * Guttmacher Institute 2017. Abortion in Africa. Incidence and trends
  2. https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/abortion-africa
  3. **The World Bank 2017 https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/sp.dyn.tfrt.in
  4. ***WHO 2019 Global health observatory country views
  5. http://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.country.country-ETH Last updated 2019-02-08
  6. http://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.country.country-TZA?lang=en Last updated 2019-04-25
  7. http://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.country.country-ZMB?lang=en last updated 2019-04-25
  8. ***Comparable and reliable data on abortion incidence not available