From: The comparison of healthcare utilization inequity between URRBMI and NCMS in rural China
Inpatient visit | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Variables | URRBMI (dy/dx) | 95% CI | NCMS (dy/dx) | 95% CI |
Per capita Household Income (Ref: the lowest) | ||||
The second | 0.024 | [−0.016, 0.064] | −0.009 | [− 0.035, 0.017] |
The third | 0.008 | [−0.027, 0.044] | 0.003 | [−0.024, 0.030] |
The fourth | 0.006 | [−0.030, 0.042] | −0.002 | [− 0.029, 0.024] |
The highest | −0.005 | [− 0.042, 0.031] | −0.020 | [− 0.048, 0.007] |
Gender (Ref: female) | 0.017 | [−0.007, 0.041] | 0.000 | [−0.019, 0.018] |
Age (Ref: 45–60) | 0.029** | [0.006, 0.053] | 0.017* | [−0.002, 0.036] |
Self-assessed health (Ref: poor) | ||||
Excellent | / | / | −0.070*** | [−0.112, − 0.029] |
Very good | − 0.106*** | [− 0.130, − 0.082] | −0.094*** | [− 0.111, − 0.078] |
Good | − 0.078*** | [− 0.101, − 0.055] | −0.076*** | [− 0.094, − 0.057] |
Fair | −0.093*** | [− 0.119, − 0.066] | − 0.101*** | [− 0.121, − 0.081] |
Chronic (Ref: not sick) | 0.058*** | [0.029, 0.087] | 0.063*** | [0.042, 0.084] |
Marital Status (Ref: single/divorced/widowed) | −0.073*** | [− 0.118, − 0.027] | −0.024* | [− 0.052, 0.004] |
Education (Ref: illiterate) | ||||
Primary | −0.001 | [−0.030, 0.028] | − 0.011 | [− 0.032, 0.011] |
Junior/senior high school | − 0.003 | [− 0.040, 0.034] | −0.010 | [− 0.037, 0.017] |
College or higher | −0.025 | [− 0.059, 0.009] | −0.004 | [− 0.033, 0.025] |
Region (Ref: east) | ||||
Central | −0.004 | [− 0.032, 0.024] | 0.007 | [−0.017, 0.030] |
West | 0.038** | [0.006, 0.069] | 0.023* | [−0.001, 0.046] |
Community (Ref: township and village) | 0.004 | [−0.047, 0.054] | −0.022 | [− 0.058, 0.014] |
Sample size | 3555 | 5409 |