Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive statistics (2002, 2006, 2011 and 2015)

From: Subjective social status, social network and health disparities: empirical evidence from Greece

Variable

Year

2002

N = 926

2006

N = 4003

2011

N = 6569

2015

N = 2012

Self- rated health status

 Very bad

0.8%

2.2%

2.0%

2.3%

 Bad

4.2%

6.1%

4.9%

5.4%

 Average

21.7%

20.3%

24.2%

22.8

 Good

43.7%

37.5%

41.3%

40.7%

 Very good

25.5%

32.6%

27.5%

28.8%

Urbanization

 Urban

63.5%

73.9%

74.3%

 Rural

36.5%

26.1%

25.7%

Gender

 Male

39.4%

49.3%

48%

47.6%

 Female

58.3%

50.7%

52%

52.4%

Marital Status

 Married

59.4%

69.4%

63.4%

 Single

29%

20.4

25%

 Divorced

2.8%

2.9%

3.1%

 Widow

7.6%

7.3%

8.5%

Number of family membersa

2.99(2.12)

2.94(1.33)

Public health insurance

 Yes

95%

95.1%

91.9%

 No

4.1%

4.6%

7.3%

Private health insurance

 Yes

11.9%

15.6%

13.2%

 No

85.6%

83.6%

85.5%

Age

 18–24

2.9%

1.5%

6.7%

9.4%

 25–39

24.9%

13.3%

25.1%

25.9%

 40–54

32.4%

22.1%

28.1%

26.4%

 55–64

17.7%

16.1%

17.6%

15.4%

 65+

19.4%

46.4%

22.4%

22.9%

Existence of chronic disease

 Yes

36.4%

40.1%

42.1%

 No

62.7%

59.9%

57.9%

Social networkb

 0

3.4%

 1–2

28.7%

 3–5

46.6%

 Over 6

21.2%

Self-rated SES

 Scale 1 – Lowest social status

4.3%

 Scale 2

3.1%

 Scale 3

5.6%

 Scale 4

7.6%

 Scale 5

25.7%

 Scale 6

15.2%

 Scale 7

17.4%

 Scale 8

10.2%

 Scale 9

2.7%

 Scale 10 – Higher social status

2.0%

  1. aAverage figure of family members is showed (std deviation)
  2. bSocial network has been measured via the question “how many people do you feel close with so you can count on them?”