Skip to main content

Table 2 Relative risk ratios in Multinomial Logistic Regression modelling for source of care (base category = attendance at private for profit; Data source - UNHS 2002/3 and 2005/6)

From: Changes in utilization of health services among poor and rural residents in Uganda: are reforms benefitting the poor?

No of Level obs = 4285

     

Prob > chi2 = 0.0000

     
 

RRR

SE

P value

95% Confidence Intervals

Private not for profit facility relative to Private for profit

Female

1.2214

.3083

.428

.7447

2.0034

Rural residence

1.1760

.2450

.436

.7817

1.7691

Within 5 km to health facility

.9935

.1404

.963

.753

1.3106

Vulnerable female headed Household

.7629

.2336

.377

.41866

1.3903

Vulnerable elderly headed HH

1.2813

.2407

.187

.8866

1.8517

Quintile 2

.6643

.1422

.056

.43672

1.0106

Quintile 3

.8888

.1759

.552

.603

1.3101

Quintile 4

.7790

.1599

.224

.5209

1.1651

Quintile 5

.7007

.1635

.128

.4435

1.1072

Time (2005/6 = 1)*

2.3398

.3435

.000

1.7546

3.1201

Public facility relative to private for profit

Female*

1.3297

.1714

.027

1.0328

1.7119

Rural residence

1.0776

.1148

.483

0.8744

1.3281

Within 5 km from the health facility

.9667

.0689

.635

0.8405

1.1118

Vulnerable female headed household

1.1471

.1765

.372

0.8484

1.5510

Vulnerable elderly headed HH*

1.4891

.1439

.000

1.2321

1.7996

Quintile 2*

.7666

.0766

.008

0.6302

0.9324

Quintile 3*

.6860

.0692

.000

0.5629

0.8360

Quintile 4*

.5395

.0572

.000

0.4381

0.6642

Quintile 5*

.3837

.0478

.000

0.3005

0.4899

Time; (2005/6 = 1)*

1.3076

.0945

.000

1.1349

1.5066

  1. (Private for profit is the base outcome) *Statistically significant.
  2. UNHS = Uganda National Household Survey; RRR = Relative risk ratio; SE = Standard error