Skip to main content

Table 2 Relative risk ratios in Multinomial Logistic Regression modelling for source of care (base category = attendance at private for profit; Data source - UNHS 2002/3 and 2005/6)

From: Changes in utilization of health services among poor and rural residents in Uganda: are reforms benefitting the poor?

No of Level obs = 4285      
Prob > chi2 = 0.0000      
  RRR SE P value 95% Confidence Intervals
Private not for profit facility relative to Private for profit
Female 1.2214 .3083 .428 .7447 2.0034
Rural residence 1.1760 .2450 .436 .7817 1.7691
Within 5 km to health facility .9935 .1404 .963 .753 1.3106
Vulnerable female headed Household .7629 .2336 .377 .41866 1.3903
Vulnerable elderly headed HH 1.2813 .2407 .187 .8866 1.8517
Quintile 2 .6643 .1422 .056 .43672 1.0106
Quintile 3 .8888 .1759 .552 .603 1.3101
Quintile 4 .7790 .1599 .224 .5209 1.1651
Quintile 5 .7007 .1635 .128 .4435 1.1072
Time (2005/6 = 1)* 2.3398 .3435 .000 1.7546 3.1201
Public facility relative to private for profit
Female* 1.3297 .1714 .027 1.0328 1.7119
Rural residence 1.0776 .1148 .483 0.8744 1.3281
Within 5 km from the health facility .9667 .0689 .635 0.8405 1.1118
Vulnerable female headed household 1.1471 .1765 .372 0.8484 1.5510
Vulnerable elderly headed HH* 1.4891 .1439 .000 1.2321 1.7996
Quintile 2* .7666 .0766 .008 0.6302 0.9324
Quintile 3* .6860 .0692 .000 0.5629 0.8360
Quintile 4* .5395 .0572 .000 0.4381 0.6642
Quintile 5* .3837 .0478 .000 0.3005 0.4899
Time; (2005/6 = 1)* 1.3076 .0945 .000 1.1349 1.5066
  1. (Private for profit is the base outcome) *Statistically significant.
  2. UNHS = Uganda National Household Survey; RRR = Relative risk ratio; SE = Standard error