Skip to main content

Table 1 Frequency distribution, unadjusted and conditional multiple logistic regressions of stunting with socio-economic predictors (coefficients are expressed as odds ratios and p-values for the test of trend are indicated)

From: Mothers' education but not fathers' education, household assets or land ownership is the best predictor of child health inequalities in rural Uganda

Variables

Total

Stunted b

Unadjusted

Adjusted

 

na (%)

n (%)

OR

95%CI

OR

95%CI

Child age in months

   18–23

150 (22)

61 (41)

5.2

2.9–9.3***

5.1

2.6–9.8***

   12–17

189 (27)

56 (30)

3.2

1.8–5.7***

3.0

1.6–5.8**

   6–11

195 (28)

36 (19)

1.7

            0.9–3.1

1.8

0.9–3.5

   0–5

164 (23)

19 (12)

1.0

 

1.0

 

p-value for trend test

  

<0.001

 

<0.001

 

Child sex is male

354 (49)

105 (31)

1.9

1.3–2.7***

2.0

1.3–3.0**

Mother's education

   None

148 (21)

45 (31)

2.5

1.4–4.4**

2.1

1.1–3.9*

   Stopped in primary

282 (40)

80 (30)

2.3

1.4–3.9**

2.1

1.2–3.8*

   Completed primary

131 (18)

22 (18)

1.2

             0.6–2.2

1.0

0.5–2.0

   Above primary

152 (21)

23 (15)

1.0

 

1.0

 

   p-value for trend test

  

<0.001

 

0.03

 

Father's education

   None

          59 (9)

17 (30)

1.7

0.8–3.5

  

   Stopped in primary

179 (29)

47 (27)

1.5

0.9–2.6

  

   Completed primary

151 (24)

36 (24)

1.3

0.8–2.3

  

   Stopped in secondary

95 (15)

17 (18)

0.9

0.5–1.8

  

   Secondary 4 or above

142 (23)

27 (20)

1.0

   

   p-value for trend test

  

0.03

   

Household wealth index

   1st quintile (Poorest)

139 (20)

38 (29)

2.1

1.2–3.7**

  

   2nd quintile

140 (20)

36 (26)

1.7

0.9–2.9

  

   3rd quintile

150 (21)

33 (24)

1.3

0.8–2.5

  

   4th quintile

140 (20)

36 (26)

1.1

0.6–2.0

  

   5th quintile (Least poor)

140 (20)

23 (17)

1.0

   

   p-value for trend test

  

0.01

   

Land ownership

   None

          73 (10)

16 (22)

0.9

0.5 – 1.8

  

   1 acre or less

179 (25)

39 (23)

0.9

0.6 – 1.6

  

   2 acres

167 (24)

44 (28)

1.2

0.7 – 2.1

  

   3 or 4 acres

152 (22)

37 (25)

1.0

0.6 – 1.8

  

   5 acres or more

135 (19)

32 (24)

1.0

   

   p-value for trend test

  

0.78

   

Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit

chi-square p-value

    

0.90

 
  1. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001
  2. aTotals for some categories do not add up to 720 because of missing values
  3. bBelow -2 SD height-for-age of the NCHS/WHO reference