Skip to main content

Table 5 Univariate analysis (unadjusted results) of Resource Utilisation Bands at age 5 by socio-economic position variables

From: Socio-economic position and childhood multimorbidity: a study using linkage between the Avon Longitudinal study of parents and children and the general practice research database

Socio-economic marker

Resource Utilisation Band at age 5 (% within SEP category)

 

Non-user

Healthy user

Low or moderate morbidity

χ2; p-value

Mother’s education

O level or lower

24 (22.0%)

32 (29.4%)

53 (48.6%)

χ22 = 2.9; p = 0.2

A level or degree

14 (35.9%)

9 (23.1%)

16 (41.0%)

Father’s education

O level or lower

20 (26.0%)

23 (29.9%)

34 (44.2%)

χ22 = 0.5; p = 0.8

A level or degree

18 (25.4%)

18 (25.4%)

35 (49.3%)

Family social class

I, II, III non-manual

23 (31.1%)

20 (27.0%)

31 (41.9%)

χ22 = 2.4; p = 0.3

III manual, IV V

15 (20.3%)

21 (28.4%)

38 (51.4%)

Housing tenure (in pregnancy)

Owned/mortgaged

27 (22.5%)

38 (31.7%)

55 (45.8%)

χ22 = 6.2; p = 0.05

Other

11 (39.3%)

3 (10.7%)

14 (50.0%)

Family adversity index

0

18 (28.1%)

19 (29.7%)

27 (42.2%)

χ62 = 9.8; p = 0.1

1

11 (26.2%)

6 (14.3%)

25 (59.5%)

2

4 (19.1%)

6 (28.6%)

11 (52.4%)

≥3

5 (23.8%)

10 (47.6%)

6 (28.6%)

Townsend score (quintile)

1st (least deprived)

9 (18.0%)

16 (32.0%)

25 (50.0%)

χ62 = 4.2; p = 0.6

2

11 (37.9%)

6 (20.7%)

12 (41.4%)

3

8 (28.6%)

8 (28.6%)

12 (42.9%)

4th or 5th (most deprived)1

10 (24.4%)

11 (26.8%)

20 (48.8%)

  1. 1. Groups combined as numbers small.