Table 2 Number of CTs and MRIs per million population in the study sites and the selected OECD countries
From: Equity in the distribution of CT and MRI in China: a panel analysis
Study sites in China | CT | MRI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
2009 | Change from 2006 to 2009 (%) | 2009 | Change from 2006 to 2009 (%) | |
Shanghai | 7.6 | 62.7 | 3.2 | 72.8 |
Zhejiang | 8.3 | 31.0 | 2.6 | 36.5 |
Shaanxi | 8.5 | 63.8 | 2.2 | 63.7 |
Hunan | 6.0 | 42.2 | 1.3 | 67.1 |
Entire sample | 7.4 | 45.3 | 2.1 | 55.7 |
OECD Countries | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Australia | 38.8 | −30.7 | 5.9 | 22.9 |
Austria | 29.9 | 1.0* | 18.0 | 11.1 |
Canada | 13.9 | 15.8 | 8.0 | 29.0 |
Denmark | 23.7 | 50.0 | 15.4 | 51.0†|
Finland | 20.5 | 38.5 | 16.2 | 10.2* |
Greece | 33.9 | 28.4 | 21.8 | 33.7 |
Ireland | 15.8 | 23.4 | 12.3 | 21.4 |
Israel | 7.7 | 42.6 | 1.7 | 21.4 |
Iceland | 34.5 | 42.6 | 21.9 | 11.2 |
Japan | 97.3 | 5.1‡ | 43.1 | 7.5* |
New Zealand | 14.6 | 18.7‡ | 9.7 | 10.2‡ |
R.O.Korea | 37.1 | 10.1 | 19.0 | 39.7 |
UK | 7.4 | −1.3* | 5.6 | 3.7* |
US | 34.3 | 6.5§ | 25.9 | −2.6§ |
Entire sample | 41.8 | 1.04 | 24.1 | −0.14 |