Table 2 Results of logistic regression analysis for the odds of ranking child care first for new government spending (No=0, Yes=1)
Characteristics | Model 1: Unadjusted OR† | Model 2: Adjusted OR‡ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Odds ratio [95% CI] | P | Odds ratio [95% CI] | P | |
Sex | ||||
Male | 1.40 [1.05,1.86] | .022 | 2.18 [1.25,3.79] | .006 |
Female (reference) | ||||
Age | ||||
18– 29 | 11.4 [5.48,23.7] | .000 | 1.65 [.11,24.2] | .715 |
30–44 | 8.12 [3.95,16.7] | .000 | 1.05 [.08,14.4] | .968 |
45–64 | 2.88 [1.38,5.98] | .005 | .65 [.05,9.13] | .749 |
65+ (reference) | ||||
Household income | ||||
<$20-000 | .48 [.27,.85] | .012 | .92 [.30,2.84] | .889 |
$20,000-<$40,000 | .69 [.45,1.05] | .085 | .72 [.28,1.85] | .501 |
$40,000-<$60,000 | .66 [.43,1.02] | .061 | .67 [.31,1.46] | .313 |
$60,000-<$80,000 | .92 [.57,1.49] | .743 | .91 [.40,2.06] | .823 |
$80,000+ (reference) | ||||
Educational attainment | ||||
<High-school | 1.10 [.77,1.57] | .593 | 1.75 [.82,3.74] | .151 |
College | 1.08 [.74,1.56] | .704 | 1.16 [.58,2.32] | .672 |
University/Post-grad (reference) | ||||
Parenthood | ||||
Children <6 years of age | 4.21[2.68,6.63] | .000 | 4.73 [2.56,8.75] | .000 |
No children <6 years of age reference | ||||
Residence status | ||||
Rural | .97 [.66, 1.42] | .867 | ||
Urban (reference) | ||||