Table 3 Types of Inequities Mentioned by Dementia Strategies by Country
From: Considering inequities in national dementia strategies: breadth, depth, and scope
Country | Inequities Mentioned? | Type of SDH Mentioned | General Objective Mentioned? | Specific Objective(s) Mentioned? | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Race & Ethnicity | Religion | Age | Disability | Sexuality & Gender | Social Class | Rurality | N | Target: Quantified Goal | Target: Specific Deadline | Budget or Financial Allocation | |||
Australia | YES | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 5 | YES | |||||
Austria | YES | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 3 | NO | |||||||
Canada | YES | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 6 | YES | ✓ | |||
Denmark | YES | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 3 | YES | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
Finland | YES | ✓ | 1 | YES | |||||||||
France | YES | ✓ | ✓ | 2 | NO | ||||||||
Germany | YES | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 7 | YES | ✓ | ✓ | |
Greece | YES | ✓ | 1 | YES | |||||||||
Ireland | YES | ✓ | ✓ | 2 | YES | ||||||||
Israel | YES | ✓ | 1 | YES | |||||||||
Korea | YES | ✓ | 1 | YES | ✓ | ||||||||
Luxembourg | NO | 0 | NO | ||||||||||
Netherlands | YES | ✓ | 1 | YES | ✓ | ||||||||
Switzerland | NO | 0 | NO | ||||||||||
United States | YES | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 3 | YES | |||||||
Total: N (%) | 15 | 6 (40) | 1 (7) | 9 (60) | 8 (53) | 3 (20) | 3 (20) | 6 (40) | |||||