Skip to main content

Table 3 Discriminatory accuracy of the intersectional model in the study periods

From: Impact of an oral care subsidization reform on intersectional inequities in self-rated oral health in Sweden

 

Model estimates

Model comparisons

Pre-reform

Early post-reform

Late post-reform

Early post- vs. pre-reform

Late post- vs. early post-reform

Late post-reform vs. pre-reform

Model 1

single dimensions

0.59 (0.58–0.60)

0.61(0.59–0.61)

0.62 (0.61–0.62)

p < 0.05

p < 0.05

p < 0.01

Model 2

intersectional strata

0.60 (0.59–0.61)

0.61(0.60–0.61)

0.62 (0.61–0.62)

p < 0.05

p < 0.01

p < 0.01

ΔAUC*

0.01

0.004

0.004

0.01

0.004

0.004

  1. Estimates are reported as Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) and 95% confidence interval
  2. *model comparison refers to Model 2