From: Are institutional deliveries equitable in the southern states of India? A benefit incidence analysis
Type of Public health centre | Wealth quintile | Number people utilizing public health service (1) | Utilization rate (2) | Median OOP in public health service (3) | Median cost of service in private health centre (4) | Net subsidy at public health centre (5 = 4 − 3) | Individual subsidy (6 = 5*2) | Benefit incidence (%) (7) | N |  |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Primary: Sub-centres/PHC/ UHC/Othersa | Poorest | 925 | 0.3269 | 2000 | 30,000 | 28,000 | 9152 | 32.78 | 3622 | Â |
Poorer | 706 | 0.2495 | 2000 | 30,000 | 28,000 | 6985 | 25.02 | 3,188 | Â | |
Middle | 554 | 0.1958 | 2000 | 30,000 | 28,000 | 5481 | 19.63 | 2,737 | Â | |
Richer | 427 | 0.1509 | 2000 | 30,000 | 28,000 | 4225 | 15.13 | 2,304 | Â | |
Richest | 218 | 0.0770 | 3000 | 30,000 | 27,000 | 2080 | 7.45 | 1,437 | Â | |
Total | 2,830 | Â | Â | Â | Â | 27,923 | Â | 13,288 | Â | |
Secondary: Government/Municipal /Rural Hospital | Poorest | 2697 | 0.2579 | 3000 | 30,000 | 27,000 | 6963 | 25.79 | 3622 | Â |
Poorer | 2,482 | 0.2373 | 3000 | 30,000 | 27,000 | 6408 | 23.73 | 3,188 | Â | |
Middle | 2,183 | 0.2087 | 3000 | 30,000 | 27,000 | 5636 | 20.87 | 2,737 | Â | |
Richer | 1,877 | 0.1795 | 3000 | 30,000 | 27,000 | 4846 | 17.95 | 2,304 | Â | |
Richest | 1,219 | 0.1166 | 3000 | 30,000 | 27,000 | 3147 | 11.66 | 1,437 | Â | |
Total | 10,458 | Â | Â | Â | Â | 27,000 | Â | 13,288 | Â | |
Any public health facility | Poorest | 3622 | 0.2726 | 2600 | 30,000 | 27,400 | 7469 | 27.55 | 3857 | Â |
Poorer | 3,188 | 0.2399 | 3000 | 30,000 | 27,000 | 6478 | 23.90 | 4141 | Â | |
Middle | 2,737 | 0.2060 | 3000 | 30,000 | 27,000 | 5561 | 20.51 | 4275 | Â | |
Richer | 2,304 | 0.1734 | 3000 | 30,000 | 27,000 | 4682 | 17.27 | 4678 | Â | |
Richest | 1,437 | 0.1081 | 3000 | 30,000 | 27,000 | 2920 | 10.77 | 5453 | Â | |
Total | 13,288 | Â | Â | Â | Â | 27,109 | Â | 22,403 | Â |