Skip to main content

Table 2 Correlation analysis of effective coverage and social health determinants by municipality

From: Evaluation of effective coverage for type 2 diabetes in Mexican primary care health information systems: a retrospective registry analysis

 

Quintiles of effective coverage

 

Characteristic

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q5

p-value (Kruskal–Wallis test)

Mean (min – max)

Mean (min – max)

Mean (min – max)

Mean (min – max)

Mean (min – max)

Effective coverage (%)

1.6

(0.1–3.2)

4.9

(3.2–6.5)

8.7

(6.5–10.9)

14.4

(10.9–19.1)

34.4

(19.2–100.0)

 

Population

45,425

(537–1,679,610)

68,576

(345–1,789,531)

84,479

(234–1,503,505)

67,799

(375–1,815,551)

23,029

(288–610,700)

0.0001

Population density

187.0

(0.8–7882.5)

371.3

(0.3–12,494.2)

521.6

(0.5–16,435.4)

398.3

(0.1–16,898.2)

126.9

(0.4–7856.0)

0.0001

Population with multidimensional poverty (%)

70.5

(19.0–97.3)

65.5

(21.4–97.4)

63.4

(12.8–97.0)

64.6

(8.7–96.6)

67.5

(14.3–96.4)

0.0001

Population with low education (%)

32.3

(8.2–62.5)

29.1

(8.7–53.1)

28.3

(5.4–59.5)

28.6

(3.7–61.1)

30.9

(4.8–65.1)

0.0001

Population without access to health services (%)

15.5

(1.9–50.2)

14.6

(2.0–40.8)

13.7

(3.0–39.3)

13.3

(2.0–34.6)

12.9

(0.9–77.4)

0.0001

Population lacking basic sanitation services (%)

50.1

(0.3–99.6)

43.1

(0.1–99.9)

41.6

(0.1–98.7)

39.0

(0.0–100.0)

43.0

(0.0–100.0)

0.0001