Skip to main content

Table 3 Self-perceived oral health regression results

From: Socioeconomic inequalities in self-perceived oral health among adults in Chile

 

OLS

Heckman Two-step

Ordered Model

Ordered Model Sample Selection

Coef.

p-value

Coef.

p-value

Coef.

p-value

Coef.

p-value

Sex

−3.991

0.000

−2.433

0.042

−0.351

0.000

−0.092

0.411

Age (base: 18–30)

 31–40

3.912

0.001

2.807

0.029

0.338

0.000

0.144

0.197

 41–50

5.970

0.000

4.622

0.001

0.515

0.000

0.265

0.032

 51–61

7.219

0.000

6.429

0.000

0.637

0.000

0.447

0.000

Head of household

1.522

0.038

−1.506

0.456

0.161

0.008

−0.270

0.049

Married/partner

−0.364

0.609

−0.186

0.784

−0.030

0.636

−0.002

0.973

Children under 5

2.273

0.001

2.974

0.000

0.196

0.001

0.265

0.000

Children aged 5-18

0.253

0.327

0.498

0.161

0.016

0.497

0.047

0.053

Education (base: Middle or less)

 Incomplete secondary school

−1.184

0.217

−2.162

0.069

−0.113

0.182

−0.231

0.004

 Complete secondary school

−3.455

0.001

−4.749

0.000

−0.320

0.001

−0.450

0.000

 Higher Education

−6.031

0.000

−7.206

0.000

−0.536

0.000

−0.623

0.000

Employed full time

0.211

0.739

1.420

0.196

0.004

0.941

0.170

0.018

Employed part time

−1.018

0.251

−1.425

0.124

−0.116

0.130

−0.154

0.048

Healthcare system (base: Public Insurance A, most vulnerable)

 Public Insurance B

−2.493

0.002

−3.166

0.001

−0.231

0.000

−0.291

0.000

 Public Insurance C

−2.164

0.039

−3.640

0.004

−0.209

0.021

−0.379

0.000

 Public Insurance D (least vulnerable)

−2.382

0.006

−3.475

0.007

−0.223

0.003

−0.341

0.000

 Public Insurance unknown category

−2.131

0.172

3.431

0.771

−0.262

0.053

0.518

0.204

Inverse Mills ratio (IMR)

  

−4.294

0.105

    

Constant

32.623

0.000

42.148

0.000

    

Observations

1,394

 

1,394

 

1,394

 

1,394

 

R-squared

0.138

       

LR test indep equations

      

6.04

0.014

  1. Abbreviations: OLS Ordinary Least Squares, Coef estimated coefficient
  2. The dependent variable is the OHIP-14 score. Independent variables are described in Table 1. The first two columns report OLS estimates without correction for sample selection. The next two correct for sample selection using Heckman’s two-step estimator. The third set estimates an ordered multinomial model, whereas the final set corrects the ordered multinomial model for sample selection. Clustered standard errors at the municipality of residence level are reported
  3. Inv. Mills ratio (IMR) is the sample selection correction variable in the Heckman model. After estimating the participation equation (Additional file 1: Table S1), for each observation in the sample we compute \( \hat{\lambda} \) =ϕ(x3 \( \widehat{\beta_3} \))/Φ(x3 \( \widehat{\beta_3} \)), where ϕ is the density of the Normal Distribution and Φ is its cumulative
  4. LR test indep equations (likelihood-ratio test) tests hypothesis that the errors of OHIP-14 and participation equations are uncorrelated in the ordered response model