Skip to main content

Table 6 Prescription drug charges and the demand for other health services

From: What impact do prescription drug charges have on efficiency and equity? Evidence from high-income countries

Good/service affected

Variable

Effect

Study

OTC drugs

Co-insurance

-

Liebowitz [32] (US, ES, CD, R)

 

Insurance coverage

  
 

   Supplementary (vs. none)

+

Caussat and Glaude [34] (FR, OS, CD, R)

 

   Supplementary (vs. none)

-

Stuart and Grana [33] (US, OS, CD, R)

 

Prescription limit

+

Cox et al. [35] (US, OS, CD, R)

physician services

Co-payment

-

Anis et al. [129] (CA, OS, PD, R); Balkrishnan et al. [130] (US, NS, PD, R); Lauterbach et al. [131] (GE, OS, CD, R); Winkelmann [132] (GE, NS, PD, R); Winkelmann [133] (GE, NS, CD, R)

 

Co-payment

0

Gardner et al. [29] (US, NS, TD, R)

 

Multi-tier formulary (vs. 1- or 2-tiers)

0

Motheral and Fairman [28] (US, NS, CD, R)

 

Reference pricing

-

Hazlet and Blough [36] (CA, NS, TD, R)

 

Mixed system

+

Li et al. [31] (CA, NS, PD, R)

 

Change from

  
 

   co-insurance to deductible and co-insurance

0

Pilote et al. [30] (CA, NS, CD, R)

 

Insurance coverage

  
 

   Public Supplementary (vs. private)

+

Raynaud [134] (FR, OS, CD, R)

 

Reimbursement limit

-

Hsu et al. [135] (US, OS, PD, R)

outpatient services

Co-payment

+

Balkrishnan et al. [130] (US, NS, PD, R)

 

Mixed system

+

Gaynor et al. [99] (US, OS, PD, R)

 

Insurance coverage

  
 

   Public supplementary (vs. none)

+

Raynaud [134] (FR, OS, CD, R)

inpatient services

Co-payment

+

Anis et al. [129] (CA, OS, PD, R); Atella et al. [76] (IT, NS, CD, R); Balkrishnan et al. [130] (US, NS, PD, R)

 

Co-payment

0

Gardner et al. [29] (US, NS, TD, R)

 

Reference pricing

0

Hazlet and Blough [36] (CA, NS, TD, R)

 

Multi-tier formulary (vs. 1- or 2-tiers)

0

Motheral and Fairman [28] (US, NS, CD, R)

 

Mixed system

0

Gaynor et al. [99] (US, OS, PD, R)

 

Insurance coverage

  
 

   Supplementary (vs. none)

-

Schoen et al. [74] (US, NS, CD, NR)

 

   Public supplementary drug (vs. private)

-

Lingle et al. [136] (US, OS, CD, R)

 

Prescription limit

0

Soumerai et al. [38] (US, NS, TD, R)

 

Prescription limit

+

Soumerai et al. [37] (US, NS, TD, R)

 

Reimbursement limit

+

Hsu et al. [135] (US, OS, PD, R)

ER visits

Multi-tier formulary (vs. 1- or 2-tiers)

0

Motheral and Fairman [28] (US, NS, CD, R)

 

Reference pricing

+

Hazlet and Blough [36] (CA, NS, TD, R)

 

Change from

  
 

   co-payment to co-insurance and annual maximum

+

Tamblyn et al. [72] (CA, NS, TD, R)

 

   co-insurance to deductible and co-insurance

0

Pilote et al. [30] (CA, NS, CD, R)

 

Reimbursement limit

+

Hsu et al. [135] (US, OS, PD, R)

 

Prescription limit

+

Soumerai et al. [37] (US, NS, TD, R)

emergency mental health services

Prescription limit

+

Soumerai et al. [38] (US, NS, TD, R)

nursing home admissions

Prescription limit

+

Soumerai et al. [38] (US, NS, TD, R)

  1. Country: CA = Canada; FR = France; GE = Germany; IT = Italy; US = United States
  2. Type of study: ES = experimental study; NS = natural study; OS = observational study
  3. Type of data analyzed: CD = cross-sectional data; TD = time-series data; PD = panel data
  4. Type of statistical analysis used: R = regression techniques; NR = no regression techniques