A systematic assessment of the concept and practice of public-private mix for tuberculosis care and control

Table 3 Data availability for review against Global PPM objectives

	Any data presented	Data compared to:				Data compared to other involved providers in locality	Projects for which any quantitative data presented*
Numbers of programmes for which:		Study control arm	Respectively Non-engaged private or NGO^a providers in locality	Public sector in locality	Country/Regional data
PFPs^b
Increase case detection	16	4	2	14	11	10	A,B,F†,H,I,J,K,L,M,N,O,R†,S,T,U,V
Improve Treatment Outcome	14	4	2	12	8	10	F†,B,H†,I,J,K,L,N†,P,R,S,T,U†,V
Enhance Access and Equity	8	3	4	5	1	6	F†,H,K,L,N,S,T,V
Reduce financial burden on patients	7	4	7	5	1	7	F†,H,K,L,S,T,V
NGOs ^a
Increase case detection	8	0	1	4	4	4	A,C,F,H,J,N,Q†,U
Improve Treatment Outcome	9	0	1	6	6	4	C,D,F,H,J,N,Q†,U
Enhance Access and Equity	4	0	1	2	0	2	C,F†,H,N
Reduce financial burden on patients	2	0	1	2	0	2	F†,H

* Each letter identifies an individual project; it is the project i.d. for list of projects, please see figure 3
† Data are not disaggregated between different types of providers
a NGO = Non Governmental Organisation
b PFP = Private For Profit

ISSN: 1475-9276