Can government subsidies and public mechanisms alleviate the physical and mental health vulnerability of China’s urban and rural residents?

Table 6 Variable description and statistics

Item	Identification VEP-PH&MH	Variables	dy/dx (%)	z
1	GS	Government subsidies	-0.0781^***	-3.88
2	PM	Public mechanism level	-0.0061	-1.18
3	HE	E_H	-0.3527^***	-20.96
4	IVS	GS*E_H	0.0744^***	3.16
5	IVS	PM*E_H	-0.0128^**	-2.22
6	PII	Gender	-0.0117^***	-2.67
7		Age	0.0005^**	2.48
8		Family size	0.0213^***	15.66
9		Marriage	-0.0189^***	-3.74
10		Education	-0.0020^***	-4.21
11	SRI	Job satisfaction	-0.0020^*	-1.64
12	SRI	Social status	-0.0010	-0.56
16	LHI	Smoke	-0.0007	-0.16
17		Drink	0.0050	0.97
18		Exercise	-0.0004^*	-1.74
19	PT	Patient trust	-0.0004	-0.59
20	UDV	Urban	-0.0101^**	-2.57
21	Number of Sampling		8831
22	Province		Yes
23	Prob >F		0.000

Source: China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) 2018 [64]
Note: *、**、*** represented statistic indicators significantly at 10, 5, and 1%, respectively

ISSN: 1475-9276