Can government subsidies and public mechanisms alleviate the physical and mental health vulnerability of China’s urban and rural residents?

Table 4 Variable description and statistics

Item	Identification VEP-PH&MH	Variables	dy/dx (%)	z
1	GS	Government subsidies	-0.0451^*	-9.29
2	PM	Public mechanism level	-0.0015	-0.32
3	PII	Gender	0.0095	1.70
4		Age	-0.0010^***	-4.12
5		Family size	0.0222^***	11.96
6		Marriage	-0.0110^*	-1.72
7		Education	-0.0007	-1.15
8	SRI	Job satisfaction	0.0048	0.18
9	SRI	Social status	-0.0004^*	-1.65
10	LHI	Smoke	0.0028	0.05
11		Drink	0.0173^**	2.50
12		Exercise	-0.0003	-1.17
13	PT	Patient trust	-0.0007	-0.67
14	UDV	Urban	-0.0167^***	-3.23
15	Number of samples		8831
16	Province		Yes
17	Prob >F		0.000

Source: China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) 2018 [64]
Note: ^*、^**、^*** represent statistic indicators significantly at 10, 5, and 1%, respectively

ISSN: 1475-9276