Skip to main content

Table 2 Distribution of financial health benefits of public spending on curative services

From: How equitable is health spending on curative services and institutional delivery in Malawi? Evidence from a quasi-longitudinal benefit incidence analysis

Health care provider 2004 2010 2016 Diff 2010-2004 Diff 2016-2010 Diff 2016-2004
CI (SE) CI (SE) CI (SE) CI (SE) CI (SE) CI (SE)
All public and CHAM health facilities 0.037a***
(0.013)
0.028b
(0.021)
0.004c
(0.011)
-0.009
(0.025)
-0.024
(0.024)
-0.033**
(0.017)
Public health facilities 0.022c
(0.013)
0.014a
(0.023)
-0.006a
(0.011)
-0.008
(0.026)
-0.020
(0.025)
-0.028
(0.017)
CHAM health facilities 0.180a***
(0.038)
0.190a**
(0.089)
0.187a***
(0.044)
0.010
(0.097)
-0.003
(0.099)
0.007
(0.058)
  1. Notes: CI concentration index, SE standard errors; dominance test: a = dominance, b= non-dominance, c= curves cross;
  2. *, **, *** statistically significant at the 10%, 5%, and 1% levels, respectively