Skip to main content

Table 5 Odds ratios for reporting poor health in relation to economic hardships and low social capital in urban areas

From: Does social capital interact with economic hardships in influencing older adults’ health? A study from China

 

Poor SRH

Poor mental health

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Urban (N = 1712)

 Economic hardships

  Yes

1.74 (1.2,2.52)b

1.74 (1.18,2.57)b

1.73 (1.17,2.55)b

1.9 (1.29,2.82)c

1.69 (1.11,2.57)a

1.71 (1.12,2.62)a

 Neighborhood cohesion

  Low

1.25 (0.99,1.56)

1.25 (0.99,1.58)

1.24 (0.99,1.56)

1.39 (1.09,1.78)b

1.53 (1.19,1.99)c

1.52 (1.17,1.97)b

 Bridging trust

  Low

1.05 (0.83,1.31)

1.04 (0.82,1.32)

1.05 (0.83,1.33)

1.22 (0.95,1.57)

1.25 (0.96,1.63)

1.26 (0.96,1.64)

 Bonding trust

  Low

0.98 (0.77,1.24)

0.97 (0.77,1.24)

0.98 (0.77,1.24)

1.36 (1.05,1.77)a

1.31 (1,1.72)a

1.33 (1.01,1.76)a

 Social participation

  Low

1.4 (1.09,1.8)b

1.32 (1.01,1.73)a

1.29 (0.98,1.69)

1.85 (1.4,2.44)c

1.45 (1.07,1.96)a

1.39 (1.02,1.89)a

  1. Model 1: Adjusted for previous health status. The four social capital components and economic hardships were separately included
  2. Model 2: Adjusted for previous health status, age, gender, educational attainment, marital status, smoking behavior, drinking behavior and family size. The four social capital components and economic hardships were separately included
  3. Model 3: Adjusted for previous health status, age, gender, educational attainment, marital status, smoking behavior, drinking behavior and family size. The four social capital components and economic hardships were simultaneously included ap<0.05, bp<0.01, cp<0.001