Skip to main content

Table 4 Multiple regression analysis of “being advised to visit a medical facility” and “being referred to a medical facility” among foreign residents who participated in free consultation activities held in Aichi Prefecture from 2012 to 2016

From: Factors associated with access to health care among foreign residents living in Aichi Prefecture, Japan: secondary data analysis

 

Being advised to visit a medical facility (N = 587a)

p-value

aPRb

95% CI

Occupation

 Professional/company

reference

  

 Labour/non-regularc

1.06

0.70–1.60

0.79

 Student

1.28

0.69–2.37

0.44

 Unemployedd

2.08

1.40–3.11

< 0.01

 Other

1.47

0.87–2.49

0.15

 No answer

1.17

0.79–1.72

0.43

Coverage under Japanese public insurance

 Covered

reference

  

 Not covered

1.56

1.19–2.05

< 0.01

 

Being referred to a medical facility (N = 596e)

p-value

PR

95% CI

Occupation

 Professional/company

ref

  

 Labour/non-regularc

1.23

0.60–2.54

0.57

 Student

2.77

1.18–6.46

0.02

 Unemployedd

3.28

1.64–6.57

< 0.01

 Other

1.32

0.45–3.87

0.61

 No answer

1.32

0.66–2.63

0.43

  1. PR prevalence ratio, aPR adjusted prevalence ratio
  2. 95% CI 95% confident interval
  3. aTwenty-one participants were excluded because it was not known if a) they were covered by Japanese public insurance or b) if they had been advised to visit a medical facilitys
  4. bMutually adjusted
  5. cIncluding trainees/interns
  6. dIncluding housewives
  7. eTwelve participants were excluded because whether they had been referred to a medical facility was unknown