Skip to main content

Table 4 Community level healthcare facility breastfeeding interventions among women of color in the U.S.: Maternity ward

From: Impact of breastfeeding interventions among United States minority women on breastfeeding outcomes: a systematic review

Study/Setting

Study Design/ methods

Study Population

Exposure/Intervention

Outcomes and Results

Grade

Merewood et al. [53]

Maternity Hospitals

Design: Prospective

N = 33 hospitals

Data: 2014–17 hospital data

4 Southern states; N = 31 hospitals; N = 210–3953 records; 2–85% AA; 0–90% H, 5–81% W

at least 3 BFH steps

BF initiation and EBF increased.

Inequities in BF initiation between AA and W decreased by 9.6% points

14 hospitals received BFH designation.

Low

Ahluwalia et al. [54]

PRAMS survey

Design: Retrospective

Data: 2004–2006 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) survey

N = 49,135 women in 11 states and NY City 56.5% W; 14.4% AA,

23.4% H

Maternity Care Practices (MCPs)a

BF ≥ 10 weeks associated with: early BF initiation (AA & W); BF on demand (AA & H); only breastmilk in hospital (all).

BF < 10 associated with: in-hospital pacifier (AA & W), BF support from hospital staff (AA); gift formula pack (H)

Low

Sebastian et al. [55]

PRAMS survey

Design: Retrospective

Data: 2012–2014 New Mexico PRAMS survey

N = 4035 Women who initiated BF; 8.4% Spanish-speaking H; 46% English-speaking H; 13.3% AI; 28.2% W

Supportive vs unsupportive BF MCPs

AI and H less likely to report BF at the hospital and receiving phone number for BF support. English-speaking H least likely to BF, only breast milk, staying in the same room, more likely to receive a gift formula pack.

Low

Nobari et al. [56]

WIC survey

Design: Observational

Data: Los Angeles County (LAC) WIC Survey (2008, 2011, 2014)

N = 1661 children ≤2 y old born at LAC hospitals (BFH; BFH in process; not BFH); 82% H

Exposure to any of 3 MCPs: Only breastmilk at hospital; Hospital gave gift formula; provided phone number for BF support.

Designated and in-process BFH associated with EBF at 1 and 3 mo.

Low

Jung et al. [57]

WIC survey

Design: pre/post Observational

Data: WIC triennial survey (2008, 2011, 2014, 2017)

N = 6449 eligible clients.

74% H

Exposure to any of 3 MCPs: Only breastmilk at hospital; Hospital gave gift formula; provided phone number for BF support.

Children born in a BFH (designated or in process) significantly higher in 2017 vs. 2014. Less formula packs in 2017. Any BF & EBF at 1 mo higher in 2017. BF at 6 mo and EBF at 1, 3, and 6 mo associated with only BF at hospital.

Low

Linares et al. [58] Medical chart

Design: Prospective

Data: Pregnancy survey, medical charts, 1 mo p.p.

N = 97 H; Central Kentucky

Skin-to-Skin Contact (SSC)

SSC vs. non-SCC

Higher EBF at discharge and at 1-mo p.p.; not associated with EBF 1-mo p.p.

Low

Ekambaram et al. [59]

Medical chart

Design: Pre/post observational

Data: medical charts, 1 mo p.p. phone survey

N = 283 pre; N = 272 post; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; 100% AA

Pacifier policy: not offering pacifier at the clinics and BF education.

Intervention associated with EBF on day of discharge; no differences on EBF at 1 mo p.p.

Very Low

  1. a1.Hospital staff gave me BF information 2. My baby stayed in the same room with me at the hospital, 3. I breastfed my baby in the hospital (not included in analysis), 4. I breastfed my baby in the first hour after my baby was born, 5.Hospital staff helped me learn how to breastfeed, 6. My baby was fed only breast milk at the hospital, 7. Hospital staff told me to breastfeed whenever my baby wanted, 8. The hospital gave me a gift pack with formula, 9. The hospital gave me a telephone number to call for help with BF, 10. My baby used a pacifier in the hospital. Abbreviations: AA African American; H Hispanic; AI American Indian; W White; BFH Baby Friendly hospital; MCPs maternity care practices; p.p. postpartum; EBF exclusive breastfeeding; BF breastfeeding