Skip to main content

Table 5 Level of Community Engagement Used in Each Phase of Research Process

From: What do you mean by engagement? – evaluating the use of community engagement in the design and implementation of chronic disease-based interventions for Indigenous populations – scoping review

Study Component

Example Study Activity

Articles

n (%)

Initiation of Partnership

• Researchers from University of Canterbury invited by Māori Peoples in New Zealand to discuss partnership and potential study goals and priorities [26]

7 (30)

Research Approval

• Australian research group met with mayor and council of remote Aboriginal community to obtain local letter of support to conduct study [19]

11 (47)

Research Question, Study Aims

• Community members and Elders involved in discussion that determined study goals [32]

6 (26)

• Community members and Elders identified and determined study goals [27]

1 (4)

Design, Methods, Approach

• Community advisory board was created to give researchers guidance on the research design to ensure cultural relevance was maintained and cultural protocols were observed [26]

2 (9)

Protocols

• Local research assistant hired to co-develop surveys and interview guides with research team [18]

2 (9)

Data Collection

• Members of Indigenous community involves in both recruitment and moderation focus groups and took notes [34]

3 (13)

Data Analysis

• Community members involved throughout data analysis process by coding and reviewing themes [23]

5 (22)

Intervention

• Stakeholder group composed of Aboriginal workers, HF patients, researchers and clinicians reviewed electronic resource, then changes were made according to feedback (i.e. appropriate skin tone/voice, plain language) [22]

11 (47)

Dissemination

• Created formative evaluative process where two external evaluators monitor study and prepare reports on progress to distribute to village [18]

3 (13)

Sustainability

• Used community leadership to develop local capacity to sustain program [28]

6 (26)