Skip to main content

Table 5 Reliability Analysis in Tanzania

From: Adaptation and validation of social accountability measures in the context of contraceptive services in Ghana and Tanzania

Qn # Scale mean if item deleted Scale Standard Deviation Variance Item total Correlation with Total Alpha if item deleted
Knowledge and Awareness of Rights
 38* 2.71 1.42 2.01 −0.17 0.83
 39 1.46 0.61 0.37 0.55 0.72
 40 1.61 0.65 0.42 0.58 0.71
 41 1.63 0.70 0.49 0.55 0.72
 42 2.24 1.26 1.58 0.47 0.73
 43 1.64 0.60 0.36 0.62 0.70
 44 1.62 0.59 0.34 0.67 0.69
 45 1.78 1.02 1.04 0.49 0.73
Reliability Coeffcients Alpha = 0.83   N of cases 752 N of items: 7
Women’s participation in household decision-making (all items)
 46† 1.60 0.49 0.24 0.51 0.88
 47† 1.41 0.49 0.24 0.48 0.88
 48† 1.69 0.46 0.21 0.56 0.88
 49† 1.64 0.48 0.23 0.66 0.87
 50† 1.62 0.48 0.23 0.65 0.87
 51† 1.72 0.45 0.20 0.67 0.87
 52† 1.63 0.48 0.23 0.51 0.88
 53† 1.81 0.39 0.15 0.68 0.87
 54† 1.84 0.36 0.13 0.69 0.87
 55† 1.82 0.38 0.15 0.62 0.87
 56† 1.76 0.43 0.18 0.56 0.88
Reliability Coeffcients Alpha = 0.83   N of cases 752 N of items: 10
Self efficacy with health care providers (Qn 57, 58 & 59)
 57** 0.94 0.23 0.05 0.43 0.43
 58** 0.95 0.22 0.05 0.51 0.31
 59** 0.76 0.43 0.18 0.26 0.68
Reliability Coeffcients   Alpha = 0.59   N of cases 752 N of items: 2
Self efficacy with health care providers (all items)
 65 2.67 1.38 1.89 −0.16 0.74
 66* 1.95 0.90 0.81 0.55 0.46
 67* 1.82 0.81 0.66 0.58 0.45
 68* 1.89 0.86 0.74 0.53 0.47
 69* 2.03 1.02 1.04 0.48 0.50
 70 1.55 0.73 0.54 0.18 0.62
Reliability Coeffcients Alpha = 0.81   N of cases 752 N of items: 3
Self-efficacy for participation at community meetings (all items) (Qn 71–73)
 71 1.88 1.27 1.61 0.73 0.75
 72 2.05 1.31 1.72 0.80 0.69
 73 2.06 1.26 1.59 0.60 0.88
Reliability Coeffcients Alpha = 0.88   N of cases 752 N of items:2
 Self-efficacy for participation at community meetings (all items)
 74 2.02 1.30 1.69 0.65 0.93
 75 2.49 1.42 2.02 0.85 0.76
 76 2.63 1.49 2.22 0.81 0.78
Reliability Coeffcients Alpha = 0.88   N of cases 752 N of items: 2
Perception of service quality (all items)
 77 1.62 0.64 0.41 0.58 0.64
 78 1.59 0.59 0.35 0.59 0.64
 79 1.70 0.65 0.42 0.53 0.66
 80 1.70 0.73 0.53 0.49 0.67
 81 2.26 1.08 1.17 0.35 0.71
 82 2.18 1.11 1.23 0.21 0.75
Reliability Coeffcients Alpha = 0.75   N of cases 752 N of items: 5
Political Capabilities
 83 1.99 1.10 1.21 0.06 0.79
 84 2.60 1.25 1.57 0.44 0.65
 85 1.93 0.85 0.72 0.52 0.61
 86 2.10 1.03 1.06 0.66 0.55
 87 2.09 1.03 1.05 0.65 0.55
Reliability Coeffcients Alpha = 0.81   N of cases 752 N of items:4
Collective efficacy (all items)
 88 1.91 1.23 1.51 0.67 0.85
 89 1.91 1.13 1.28 0.79 0.80
 90 1.80 1.06 1.12 0.71 0.83
 91 1.86 1.10 1.21 0.70 0.84
Reliability Coeffcients Alpha = 0.87   N of cases 0751 N of items:4
Community support in time of crisis (all items)
 92 1.72 1.27 1.61 0.39 0.57
 93 1.70 1.13 1.28 0.49 0.50
 94 1.90 1.28 1.64 0.39 0.57
 95 2.11 1.38 1.90 0.37 0.59
Reliability Coeffcients   Alpha = 0.63   N of cases 752 N of items:3
Mutual responsibility for and support of services (all items)
 99¥ 1.69 0.50 0.25 0.33 0.51
 100¥ 1.39 0.64 0.41 0.32 0.52
 101¥ 1.36 0.55 0.30 0.44 0.45
 102¥ 1.51 0.53 0.28 0.39 0.48
 103¥ 1.27 0.47 0.22 0.19 0.59
Reliability Coeffcients Alpha = 0.60   N of cases 752 N of items:4
  1. * Reverse coded
  2. ** Yes/No Response items
  3. † 2 Response items
  4. ¥ 3 Response items