Skip to main content

Table 1 Overview and assessment of the outcome battery

From: Effects of social network diversity in the disablement process: a comparison of causal inference methods and an outcome-wide approach to the Indonesian Family Life Surveys, 2007–2015

Outcome

Type of measurement

Response scale

I) Pathologies

1. Non-communicable disease (NCD) morbidity

Self-reported physician diagnosis1 of any one condition listed #2-#7; “Has a doctor ever told you that you had […]?”

0 = yes; 1 = no

2. Asthma

Self-reported physician diagnosis1

0 = yes; 1 = no

3. Other chronic lung diseases

Self-reported physician diagnosis1

0 = yes; 1 = no

4. Cancer or malignant tumours

Self-reported physician diagnosis1

0 = yes; 1 = no

5. Diabetes or high blood sugar

Self-reported physician diagnosis1

0 = yes; 1 = no

6. Cardiovascular diseases (heart attacks, coronary heart diseases, angina, or other heart problems)

Self-reported physician diagnosis1

0 = yes; 1 = no

7. Stroke

Self-reported physician diagnosis1

0 = yes; 1 = no

8. Prediabetes or diabetes based on glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels2

Biomarker; Dried blood spots (DBS) based assays taken from trained IFLS interviewers to measure glucose metabolism.

Continuous variable (range: 3.5–12.8%); Binary variable: 0 = yes (diabetes or prediabetes, > 5.7%); 1 = no (normal range < 5.7%)3

II) Impairments

Cardiovascular impairments:

9. Hypertension

Three measures of systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) in mmHg on alternate arms (starting left) by trained IFLS interviewers using an Omron meter (HEM-7203) and self-reported use of antihypertensive medication.

0 = yes (hypertensive; defined as mean systolic BP ≥140 mmHg and/or mean DBP ≥90 mmHg and/or current use of antihypertensive medication); 1 = no (normotensive)4

Immunological impairments:

10. Chronic inflammation based on C-reactive protein (CRP) levels2

Biomarker; CRP (plasma equivalent) concentrations from finger-prick DBS specimens measured using validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method.

Continuous variable (range: 0.01–58.95 mg/l); Binary variable: 0 = yes (> 1.0 mg/l); 1 = no (normal range < 1.0 mg/l)5

Muscoskeletal impairments:

11. Mean hand grip strengths

Physical performance test; Hand grip strengths was measured by a trained IFLS interviewer using a Baseline Smedley Spring type dynamometer (daily calibration). Respondents were asked to squeeze the dynamometer in each hand twice beginning with the dominant hand. Two measurements per hand were recorded including information on any recent surgery, swelling, inflammation, severe pain, or injury on one or both hands and recording of dominant hand.

Continuous variable (mean of four measurements, range: 0–47.75 kg)

12. Arthritis and/or rheumatism

Self-reported physician diagnosis1

0 = yes; 1 = no

Sensory impairments:

13. Hearing and/or vision problems

Self-reported physician diagnosis1

0 = yes; 1 = no

III) Functional limitations

Physical functional limitations

14. Upper-body functional limitations (UBFL)6

Self-reported physical functioning measures; including show cards; Question: “If you had […], could you do it?”

1) to carry a heavy load (like a pail of water) for 20 m

2) to draw a pail of water from a well

3) to sweep the house / floor / yard

0 = yes (includes responses “with difficulty” and “unable to do it”); 1 = no (“easily”)

15. Lower-body functional limitations (LBFL)7

Self-reported physical functioning measures; including show cards; Question: “If you had […], could you do it?”

1) to walk 1 km

2) to bow, squat, or kneel

3) to stand up from sitting on the floor without help

0 = yes (includes responses “with difficulty” and “unable to do it”); 1 = no (“easily”)

Cognitive functional limitations

16. Episodic memory score

Cognitive performance test; Immediate and delayed word recall of ten nouns. These were read out slowly and the respondent was asked to repeat the list immediately and again after 4 to 5 min. Questionnaire contained four lists of each ten words which were randomized across individuals within a household.

Continuous variable (mean number of words correctly recalled for both immediate and delayed response; range: 0–8.5 words)

17. Visuospatial ability score

Cognitive performance test; IFLS uses an abridged version of the Raven’s Progressive Matrices8, a non-verbal self-paced test in which each item contained a pattern with a missing part. The respondent had to infer the rules underlying the pattern and apply these rules to discover which of the answer options provides the correct completion for a total of eight items.

Continuous variable (one score point per correct answer; range: 0–8 points)

IV) Disabilities

18. Activities of daily living (ADLs) limitations9

Self-reported physical functioning measures for five basic tasks of everyday life; including show cards; Question: “If you had […], could you do it?”

(1) to dress without help

(2) to bathe

(3) to get out of bed

(4) to eat (eating food by oneself when it is ready)

(5) to control urination or defecation

Continuous variable (range 5–25); Binary variable: 0 = yes (includes responses “with difficulty”, “can do with help” and “unable to do it”); 1 = no (“easily”)

19. Instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) limitations10

Self-reported ability to perform IADLs items; including show cards); Question: “If you had […], could you do it?”

(1) to shop for personal needs

(2) to prepare hot meals (prepare ingredients, cooking, and serving food)

(3) to take medicine (right portion at right time)

(4) to do household chores (house cleaning, doing dishes, making the bed, and arranging the house)

(5) to shop for groceries (deciding what to buy and pay for it)

(6) to manage your money (paying your bills, keeping track of expenses, or managing assets)

Continuous variable (range 6–30); Binary variable: 0 = yes (includes responses “with difficulty”, “can do with help” and “unable to do it”); 1 = no (“easily”)

  1. Annotations Table 1:
  2. For more details see Strauss J, Witoelar F, Sikoki B. The Fifth Wave of the Indonesia Family Life Survey (IFLS5): Overview and Field Report. Santa Monica: RAND, 2016 and IFLS questionnaires available at https://www.rand.org/well-being/social-and-behavioral-policy/data/FLS/IFLS.html
  3. 1) Includes diagnoses by paramedics, nurses and midwifes
  4. 2) HbA1c and CRP values are only available for a sub-sample in IFLS-5. DBS for CRP assays were introduced in IFLS-4 for a random sample of IFLS-1 dynasty households (=9944 respondents above age 1). In IFLS-5, the target sample for repeated CRP assays and (newly introduced) HbA1c was the subset of respondents who had DBS taken in IFLS-4. There are 7579 observations with CRP data and 7524 observations with HbA1c in wave 5. Further details on sampling for the DBS and sampling weights are available in Herningtyas EH, Hu P, Edenfield M, Strauss J, Crimmins E, Witoelar F, et al. IFLS Wave 5 Dried Blood Spot Data User Guide. Santa Monica: RAND, 2018. In our analyses, we have CRP data for 1913 (35%) and HbA1C data for 1887 (34%) respondents
  5. 3) Cut-offs based on The International Expert Committee. Report on the role of the A1C assay diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009 32(7):1327–34
  6. 4) Respondents with controlled hypertension (n = 62), uncontrolled hypertension (n = 2262) and hypertension without treatment (n = 33) were classified as hypertensive. Hypertension definition adapted from WHO Expert Committee on Hypertension Control. Hypertension control. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1996
  7. 5) Cut-offs are based on Speidl WS, Zeiner A, Nikfardjam M, Geppert A, Jordanova N, Niessner A, et al. An increase of C-reactive protein is associated with enhanced activation of endogenous fibrinolysis at baseline but an impaired endothelial fibrinolytic response after venous occlusion. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2005 45 (1):30–4
  8. 6) Cronbach’s alpha for three UBFL items = 0.7863
  9. 7) Cronbach’s alpha for three LBFL items = 0.7306
  10. 8) Raven J. The Raven’s progressive matrices: change and stability over culture and time. Cogn Psychol. 2000 41 (1):1–48
  11. 9) Cronbach’s alpha for five ADL items is 0.8319; ADL items adapted from Katz S. Assessing self-maintenance: activities of daily living, mobility, and instrumental activities of daily living. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1983 31 (12):721–7
  12. 10) Cronbach’s alpha for six IADL items is 0.9043; IADL items adapted from Lawton, M.P., & Brody, E.M. (1969). Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist, 9 (3), 179–186