Skip to main content

Table 4 Regression Results of FE and Panel Quantile Regression

From: The inequality of health-income effect in employed workers in China: a longitudinal study from China Family Panel Studies

 

Fixed-Effect

Panel Quantile Regression

(2) 25th

(3) 50th

(4) 75th

(5) 90th

Good health

0.158∗ ∗ ∗ (0.020)

0.219∗ ∗ ∗ (0.071)

0.169∗ ∗ ∗ (0.053)

0.164∗ (0.085)

−0.064 (0.093)

Average health

0.113∗ ∗ ∗ (0.019)

0.171∗∗ (0.070)

0.123∗∗ (0.052)

0.082 (0.087)

−0.131 (0.095)

Age

0.035∗ ∗ ∗ (0.002)

−0.008∗ ∗ ∗ (0.001)

−0.012∗ ∗ ∗ (0.001)

−0.010∗ ∗ ∗ (0.001)

−0.006∗ ∗ ∗ (0.001)

Sex

–

0.179∗ ∗ ∗ (0.012)

0.267∗ ∗ ∗ (0.014)

0.209∗ ∗ ∗ (0.015)

0.116∗ ∗ ∗ (0.015)

Marital

0.044 (0.010)

0.167∗ ∗ ∗ (0.013)

0.285∗ ∗ ∗ (0.015)

0.307∗ ∗ ∗ (0.016)

0.215∗ ∗ ∗ (0.019)

Registered residence

−0.399∗ ∗ ∗ (0.020)

−0.290∗ ∗ ∗ (0.017)

−0.225∗ ∗ ∗ (0.019)

−0.070∗ ∗ ∗ (0.018)

−0.005 (0.019)

Junior high

–

0.061∗ ∗ ∗ (0.014)

0.093∗ ∗ ∗ (0.018)

0.050∗ ∗ ∗ (0.018)

0.012 (0.017)

Senior high or College

–

0.149∗ ∗ ∗ (0.017)

0.210∗ ∗ ∗ (0.021)

0.150∗ ∗ ∗ (0.022)

0.089∗ ∗ ∗ (0.021)

University and above

–

0.485∗ ∗ ∗ (0.033)

0.520∗ ∗ ∗ (0.036)

0.403∗ ∗ ∗ (0.040)

0.404∗ ∗ ∗ (0.072)

Occupation

0.227∗ ∗ ∗ (0.009)

0.450∗ ∗ ∗ (0.018)

0.397∗ ∗ ∗ (0.022)

0.446∗ ∗ ∗ (0.027)

0.675∗ ∗ ∗ (0.029)

Central China

–

−0.142∗ ∗ ∗ (0.016)

−0.184∗ ∗ ∗ (0.022)

−0.120∗ ∗ ∗ (0.019)

−0.109∗ ∗ ∗ (0.021)

Northeast China

–

−0.182∗ ∗ ∗ (0.020)

−0.277∗ ∗ ∗ (0.022)

−0.274∗ ∗ ∗ (0.022)

−0.229∗ ∗ ∗ (0.025)

West China

–

−0.196∗ ∗ ∗ (0.024)

−0.287∗ ∗ ∗ (0.027)

−0.293∗ ∗ ∗ (0.027)

−0.266∗ ∗ ∗ (0.027)

  1. a Numbers in parentheses are estimated robust standard errors corrected for clustering using bootstrap technique
  2. b ***, **, * Significance levels at 1, 5, and 10% respectively
  3. c Poor health as the reference group