Skip to main content

Table 3 Prevalence ratios (PR) for poor health by social position adjusted for mediators in Spanish adults

From: Self-rated health inequalities in the intersection of gender, social class and regional development in Spain: exploring contributions of material and psychosocial factors

Social position

Model Aa

Model Ba

Model Ca

Model Da

Crude model Adjusted by age

All psychosocial factors

PR

reduction

All material factors

PR reduction

All factors

PR reduction

PR

95% CI

PR

95% CI

(%)

PR

95% CI

(%)

PR

95% CI

(%)

Gender

Men

1

 

1

  

1

  

1

  

Women

1.11***

(1.07–1.16)

1.12***

(1.08–1.16)

−4.62

1.07***

(1.03–1.11)

35.93

1.09***

(1.05–1.13)

22.62

Social class

Non-manual

1

1

1

1

 

1

1

 

1

1

 

Manual

1.61***

(1.53–1.70)

1.45***

(1.38–1.53)

25.88

1.51***

(1.44–1.59)

16.87

1.40***

(1.33–1.48)

34.31

Regional development

High

1

1

1

1

 

1

1

 

1

1

 

Low

1.16***

(1.12–1.21)

1.12***

(1.08–1.16)

26.22

1.13***

(1.09–1.17)

19.29

1.10***

(1.06–1.15)

36.07

Estimates explanatory factors

Material scarcity

    

1.31***

(1.30–1.42)

 

1.18***

(1.13–1.28)

Unstable employment

    

1.23***

(1.17–1.32)

 

1.20***

(1.13–1.26)

Insecure residential area

    

1.22***

(1.13–1.27)

 

1.19***

(1.12–1.25)

Poor social support

 

1.45***

(1.38–1.53)

   

1.38***

(1.26–1.44)

Lack of social participation

 

1.47***

(1.44–1.57)

   

1.42***

(1.38–1.51)

  1. *p-value < 0.05; **p-value < 0.01; *** p-value < 0.001
  2. aModel A is the crude model; Model B is adjusted by psychosocial factors; Model C is adjusted by material factors; Model D is adjusted by all factors