Prompts | Absent, unidentifiable (Score = 0) | Not Clear or Vague, partial (Score = 1) | Clear, well described (Score = 2) |
---|---|---|---|
(AO) Are the aims and objectives of the research clearly stated? | No clear statement of aims and objectives. | Aims and objectives implied, but difficult to discern. | Aims and objectives explicitly stated and easily identifiable. |
(DES) Is the research design clearly specified and appropriate for the aims and objectives of the research? | Study design does not align with aims and objectives. and/or Little to no description of methodological approach provided. | Study design somewhat aligned with aims and objectives. and/or Some description of methodology provided, but with gaps or use of generic language used to describe methodology (e.g., ‘qualitative’). | Study design aligns with aims and objectives. and Methodological approach and theoretical foundation clearly described. |
(MET) Do the researchers provide a clear account of the process by which their findings were produced? | No clear description of study process of data generation, making it impossible to replicate study. | Data generation and analytical processes vaguely described— would be difficult to replicate study. | Methods and analytical process clearly described, consistent with methodological approach and theoretical foundation— would be possible to replicate study. |
(D) Do the researchers display enough data to support their interpretations and conclusions? | Insufficient data presented to support authors’ claims. | Difficult to discern if data is sufficient to support authors’ claims. | Data presented is compelling and clearly supports authors’ claims. |
(AN) Is the method of analysis appropriate and adequately explicated? | Analytical processes inadequate or absent; not clearly or coherently linked to conclusions. | Analytical processes vaguely described; difficult to determine coherency with study design and findings. | Analytical process well described, coherent with methodology, and logically connected to authors’ conclusions. |