Skip to main content

Table 1 Health services utilization and background characteristics

From: The effects of poverty reduction policy on health services utilization among the rural poor: a quasi-experimental study in central and western rural China

Variables, n (%) or mean (SD)

Total

(n = 6091)

Beneficiaries

(n = 1069)

Non-beneficiaries

(n = 5022)

P-value

Dependent variables outpatient services utilization within two weeks

 Any outpatient visit

0.054

  Yes

461 (18.84)

96 (22.12)

365 (18.13)

 

  No

1986 (81.16)

338 (77.88)

1648 (81.87)

 

 Outpatient institutions

   

0.310

  Village clinic

214 (44.12)

35 (33.65)

179 (46.98)

 

  Town health center

99 (20.41)

27 (25.96)

72 (18.90)

 

  Public hospital above county-level

142 (29.28)

38 (36.54)

104 (27.30)

 

  Private hospital or clinic

30 (6.19)

4 (3.85)

26 (6.82)

 

Inpatient services utilization of patients within one year

 Any inpatient visit

   

< 0.001

  Yes

1188 (19.50)

276 (25.82)

912 (18.16)

 

  No

4903 (80.50)

793 (74.18)

4110 (81.84)

 

 Inpatient institutions

   

0.274

  Town health center

351 (27.04)

83 (27.76)

268 (26.83)

 

  Public hospital of county-level

742 (57.16)

179 (59.87)

563 (56.36)

 

  Public hospital above city-level

164 (12.63)

28 (9.36)

136 (13.61)

 

  Private hospital or other institutions

41 (3.16)

9 (3.01)

32 (3.20)

 

Control variables

 Area

   

< 0.001

  Sinan County

3090 (50.73)

754 (70.53)

2336 (46.52)

 

  Dangyang County

3001 (49.27)

315 (29.47)

2686 (53.48)

 

 Distance between residence and nearest health services institutions (km)

   

< 0.001

   ≤ 1

3037 (49.90)

503(47.14)

2534(50.49)

 

  1~2

1913 (31.43)

292(27.37)

1621(32.30)

 

  2~3

743 (12.21)

182(17.06)

561(11.18)

 

  3~4

158 (2.60)

25(2.34)

133(2.65)

 

   > 4

235 (3.86)

65(6.09)

170(3.39)

 

 Household per capita annual income level

   

< 0.001

  Low income group

1218 (20.00)

368 (34.42)

850 (16.93)

 

  Lower income group

1219 (20.01)

243 (22.73)

976 (19.43)

 

  Middle income group

1210 (19.87)

193 (18.05)

1017 (20.25)

 

  Higher income group

1226 (20.13)

152 (14.22)

1074 (21.39)

 

  Highest income group

1218 (20.00)

113 (10.57)

1105 (22.00)

 

 Gender

   

0.424

  Male

2992 (49.17)

537 (50.28)

2455 (48.93)

 

  Female

3093 (50.83)

531 (49.72)

2562 (51.07)

 

 Age group

   

< 0.001

  15~24

489 (8.03)

107 (10.01)

382 (7.61)

 

  25~44

1070 (17.57)

164 (15.34)

906 (18.04)

 

  45~64

2856 (46.89)

454 (42.47)

2402 (47.83)

 

   ≥ 65

1676 (27.52)

344 (32.18)

1332 (26.52)

 

 Marital status

   

< 0.001

  Unmarried

601 (9.91)

156(14.70)

445(8.89)

 

  Married

4851 (79.98)

768(72.38)

4083(81.59)

 

  Divorced

54 (0.89)

15(1.41)

39(0.78)

 

  Widowed

548 (9.04)

116(10.93)

432(8.63)

 

  Other

11 (0.18)

6(0.57)

5(0.10)

 

 Education

   

< 0.001

  Illiteracy

1062 (17.48)

253(23.73)

809(16.14)

 

  Elementary school or junior high school

4038 (66.45)

691(64.82)

3347(66.79)

 

  High school or secondary vocational and technical school

803 (13.21)

90(8.44)

713(14.23)

 

  University degree

174 (2.86)

32(3.00)

142(2.83)

 

 Severity of disease within two weeks

   

< 0.001

  Not at all serious

30 (1.22)

4 (0.92)

26 (1.29)

 

  Not too serious

386 (15.74)

47 (10.83)

339 (16.84)

 

  Generally serious

934 (38.08)

125 (28.80)

809 (40.19)

 

  Relatively serious

989 (40.32)

223 (51.38)

760 (37.75)

 

  Very serious

114 (4.65)

35 (8.06)

79 (3.92)

 

The utility index of HRQoL

0.854 (0.002)

0.793 (0.006)

0.866 (0.002)

< 0.001

  1. Note: In the statistical analysis of dependent variables, for the variable ‘any inpatient visit’, we used an individual as an observation case. For other dependent variables, we used an outpatient or inpatient record as an observation case