From: Personalisation schemes in social care and inequality: review of the evidence and early theorising
Studies and sample sizes/methods | Factors identified |
---|---|
Arksey and Baxter (2012) 30 qualitative interviews of service suers | Informal networks and support |
Knowledge and skills in navigating complex bureaucratic systems | |
Capacity to self-manage funds | |
Dew et al. (2013) Focus groups with providers (60 participants) | Knowledge of where to access information |
Graham (2015) document review, 15 unstructured qualitative interviews | Informal networks and support |
Laragy and Ottoman (2011) Participant observation of families, 12 qualitative interviews with family representatives | Informal networks and support |
Knowledge of where to access information | |
Capacity to self-manage funds | |
Mavromaras et al. (2016) surveys with participants and their families (6246), surveys with providers (2672) qualitative interviews with participants and their families (123) qualitative interviews with survey providers (50) qualitative itnerviews with other stakeholders (114) Comparison group with clients of non-personalised services – surveys with service recipients and their families (3877), | Education |
Informal networks and support | |
Knowledge and skills in navigating complex bureaucratic systems | |
Household income | |
National Audit Office (2013) Surveys service users (completed sample 69,000) | Informal networks and support |
Knowledge and skills in navigating complex bureaucratic systems | |
Netten et al. (2012) Randomised control trial of service suers. With an overall sample of 1000 service users Interviews, questionnaires, household demographics | Education |
Employed | |
Stevens and Wilberforce (2008) 130 qualitative interviews with service providers | Knowledge and skills in navigating complex bureaucratic systems |
Warr et al.(2017) 42 qualitative interviews with service users | Education |
Knowledge and skills in navigating complex bureaucratic systems |