Skip to main content

Table 8 Logistic regression for weekly heavy episodic drinking regressed on social capital and family ties in community—separated by identity and gender

From: Gender variations in the relationship between social capital and mental health outcomes among the Indigenous populations of Canada

Total Sample Population

 

Odds Ratio for Men (Confidence Interval)

Odds Ratio for Women (Confidence Interval)

Indigenous-Specific Social Capital

 Low-Levels

 High-Levels

0.68 (0.51–0.91)*

0.91 (0.64–1.30)

Family Ties in Community

 Weak

 Strong

1.03 (0.76–1.38)

0.76 (0.54–1.09)

First Nations

 

Odds Ratio for Men (Confidence Interval)

Odds Ratio for Women (Confidence Interval)

Indigenous-Specific Social Capital

 Low-Levels

 High-Levels

0.53 (0.35–0.81)*

0.69 (0.41–1.16)

Family Ties in Community

 Weak

 Strong

1.11 (0.72–1.70)

0.61 (0.38–0.97)*

Métis

 

Odds Ratio for Men (Confidence Interval)

Odds Ratio for Women (Confidence Interval)

Indigenous-Specific Social Capital

 Low-Levels

 High-Levels

0.96 (0.60–1.56)

0.89 (0.47–1.70)

Family Ties in Community

 Weak

 Strong

1.00 (0.66–1.53)

0.98 (0.52–1.83)

Inuit

 

Odds Ratio for men (Confidence Interval)

Odds Ratio for Women (Confidence Interval)

Indigenous-Specific Social Capital

 Low-Levels

 High-Levels

0.36 (0.14–0.94)*

3.02 (1.10–8.36)*

Family Ties in Community

 Weak

 Strong

0.98 (0.49–1.94)

1.35 (0.72–2.53)

  1. 95% confidence intervals; *p < 0.05; adjusting for age, education, income, and urban/rural location