Skip to main content

Table 4 Quality assessment for randomized controlled trials included in this review

From: Assessing evidence of interventions addressing inequity among migrant populations: a two-stage systematic review

Study

Domain

Overall risk of bias

1. Randomization process

2. Deviation from intended interventions

3. Missing outcome data

4. Measurement of outcome

5.Selection of the reported results

Bastani 2015

Some concernsa,b

Low risk

Low risk

High risk

Low risk

High risk

Braschi 2014

Some concernsb,c

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Some concerns

Jandorf 2008

Some concernsa,b

Some concerns

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Some concerns

Jimenez-Fuentes MA 2013

High risk

High risk

Some concerns

Some concerns

Some concerns

High risk

Mishra, 2007

High risk

High risk

Low risk

High risk

Low risk

High risk

Nguyen, 2009

Some concernsa,b

Some concerns

Low risk

High risk

Low risk

High risk

Raberg Kjollesdal MK 2011

Low risk

Some concerns

Some concerns

Low risk

Low risk

High risk

Taylor VM 2011

Some concernsa,b

Some concerns

Low risk

High risk

Low risk

High risk

  1. aNo information was provided about allocation sequence
  2. bNo information was provided about allocation concealment
  3. cNo information was provided about baseline imbalance