From: Who should pay for the continuity of post-trial health care treatments?
Sponsors | |
---|---|
Pros | Cons |
Avoid family expenses | Could weakens the local clinical research groups participating in the trials and decreases research |
Protects the patient’s health | Could jeopardizes the financing of the tests |
Immediate access to medication for the patient / Ensuring continuity of treatment (gives patient peace of mind - possibility of placebo effect) | Reduce industry investment in countries with high prevalence of rare diseases |
The public health system would not pay | Could create an iatrogenic risk for the patient to whom the medication is given even without registration if there is no ongoing medical follow-up. |
The cost to the industry would be defined more clearly, knowing the future (the cost is internalized, knowing that it will have to be paid) | Could make the treatment more expensive and unfeasible |