Table 4 Multivariable logistic regression of facility delivery ad type of facility for delivery care
|  | Facility delivery (n = 1235) | Government facility delivery (among those who delivered at a facility) (n = 542) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Odds ratios | p | 95% CI | Odds ratios | p | 95% CI | |||
Year | ||||||||
 2013 | 1.0 | . | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | . | 1.0 | 1.0 |
 2014 | 1.7 | 0.05 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 0.4 | 0.10 | 0.2 | 1.2 |
 2015 | 1.5 | 0.25 | 0.8 | 2.9 | 0.3* | 0.02* | 0.1* | 0.8* |
Social group | ||||||||
 Least vulnerable | 1.0 | . | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | . | 1.0 | 1.0 |
 Most vulnerable | 0.7 | 0.24 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 0.48 | 0.6 | 3.5 |
Year group interaction | ||||||||
 2014 # Most vulnerable | 0.7 | 0.37 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 3.0* | 0.05* | 1.0* | 8.7* |
 2015 # Most vulnerable | 0.9 | 0.66 | 0.4 | 1.7 | 9.2*** | 0.00*** | 2.9*** | 29.3*** |
Possession of mamta card | ||||||||
 No Mamta card | 1.0 | . | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | . | 1.0 | 1.0 |
 Have Mamta card | 1.8*** | 0.00*** | 1.4*** | 2.4*** | 2.4* | 0.02* | 1.1* | 5.0* |
Woman's occupation | ||||||||
 Not employed | 1.0 | . | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | . | 1.0 | 1.0 |
 Employed | 0.8 | 0.10 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.7* | 0.02* | 0.5* | 0.9* |
Type of family | ||||||||
 Joint | 1.0 | . | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | . | 1.0 | 1.0 |
 Nuclear | 1.5*** | 0.00*** | 1.2*** | 1.9*** | 0.8 | 0.42 | 0.5 | 1.3 |
Woman's education | ||||||||
 No schooling | 1.0 | . | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | . | 1.0 | 1.0 |
 Primary | 1.9*** | 0.00*** | 1.5*** | 2.5*** | 0.5** | 0.00** | 0.4** | 0.8** |
 Secondary or higher | 3.3*** | 0.00*** | 2.1*** | 5.1*** | 0.6* | 0.04* | 0.4* | 1.0* |