Skip to main content

Table 5 Internal Migrants’ Social Integration in 2014

From: The social income inequality, social integration and health status of internal migrants in China

Variables

Definition

Options

% or x ± s

Monthly household income

Income of all family members in the current residence

 

3500-7000a

Income, occupation position, and degree of respect compared with relatives, friends and colleagues at current residence

Subjective social status and level of respect compared to other people, measured by marking a “social ladder” (1 as the bottom status to 10 as the top status)

 

5.47 ± 1.60

 

5.98 ± 1.60

Old-age insurance

Own either township workers’ old-age insurance, urban residents’ old-age insurance, or new rural social pension insurance

no

27.7

yes

72.3

Medical insurance

Own either social medical insurance or commercial medical insurance

no

14.8

yes

85.2

Number of organizations participated in (0–8)

Number of organizations respondents participated in, including labor union, volunteer associations, the Chinese Communist Party group of migrants/local residents, alumni association, chamber of commerce of hometown, fellow-townsman associations, and other organizations

 

0.40 ± 0.77

Number of activities attended (0–7)

Number of activities respondents attended, for example, community sports, social public welfare activities, election campaigns, awards events, the home owners’ committee, management activities of residents’ committees, and other activities

 

0.66 ± 1.04

Type of neighbors

Whether neighbors of respondents were registered residents, whohad “Hukou”, or migrants

Outsiders

43.5

The locals

20.6

Outsiders and locals

29.5

Not sure

6.4

Consent of the views (8–40)

Those views include 7 problems about social norms or customs:

1) The customs of the hometown (such as the customs of marriage, funerals) is more important to you;

2) Working in the current place is more important to you than living in the hometown;

3) Your child should learn to speak the hometown dialect;

4) Maintaining the hometown’s lifestyle, such as eating habits, is important;

5) There is a big difference in health habits between you and local residents;

6) There is a big discrepancy in clothing, education, or retirement style between you and local residents;

7) Your opinions of some social issues are very distinct from the local residents’.

Respondents provided their agreement with these views based on a five-point scale (strongly agree, agree, neither agree or not, disagree, strongly disagree).

 

23.80 ± 4.09

Familiarity with local dialect

Proficiency in the local language

Don’t understand

14.9

Understand some only

23.0

Understand and speak some

22.7

Understand and speak

39.4

Integration will (9–36)

Consists of 9 questions, such as, “I would like to live together with locals in a block (community)”, “I would like to be a colleague with locals”, and “I would like to be a neighbor with locals”. Respondents answered based on a four-point scale (1 = disagree completely to 4 = agree completely), with the higher score meaning better integration will.

 

30.43 ± 4.28

Discrimination perception (4–16)

Includes 4 questions: “I feel the locals are willing to accept me as a part of them,” “I feel the locals don’t want to be my neighbors,” “I feel the locals don’t like me,” and “I feel the locals look down on me” (1 = disagree completely to 4 = agree completely), with higher score meaning more discrimination perception.

 

7.34 ± 2.16

Willingness to bring family members to local residence

Whether to bring the subject’s spouse, unmarried children, or parents to local residence in the next 1 to 3 years

All of family members at location

26.6

Yes

23.6

Yes, but only some

14.1

No

30.7

Not sure

4.9

  1. Note: a interquartile