Skip to main content

Table 3 Associations between SEP and reporting four or five dental problems—adults ages 30 – 64 years

From: Socioeconomic inequalities in dental health among middle-aged adults and the role of behavioral and psychosocial factors: evidence from the Spanish National Health Survey

 

Model 1a

Model 2b

Model 3c

Model 4d

 

OR (CI95%)

p

OR (CI95%)

p

OR (CI95%)

p

OR (CI95%)

p

Level of Education

Universitye

----

---

----

---

----

---

----

---

 Secondary

2.33 (1.80–3.01)

.000

2.05 (1.58–2.66)

.000

1.96 (1.59–2.33)

.000

1.62 (1.26–1.97)

.000

 Primary

3.69 (2.86–4.77)

.000

2.82 (2.16–3.67)

.000

2.57 (2.14–3.00)

.000

1.89 (1.48–2.29)

.000

 No formal education

6.54 (4.80–8.91)

.000

4.58 (3.31–6.34)

.000

4.38 (3.68–5.08)

.000

2.94 (2.31–3.57)

.000

 

n = 17,267 (98%)

 

n = 16,920 (96%)

 

n = 16,198 (92%)

   
 

F–adjusted = 0.66 (p = 0.746)

 

F–adjusted = 0.95 (p = 0.481)

 

F-adjusted = 1.06 (p = 0.388)

   
 

log pseudolikelihood = −6741427.9

 

log pseudolikelihood = −6364312.7

 

log pseudolikelihood = −5910612.5

   
 

Model 1a

 

Model 2b

 

Model 3c

   
 

OR (CI95%)

p

OR (CI95%)

p

OR (CI95%)

p

  

Household Equivalent

Income

----

---

----

---

----

---

----

---

 Quartile 4 (highest)e

1.68 (1.37–1.98)

.000

1.54 (1.24–1.84)

.000

1.49 (1.19–1.79)

.002

1.25 (0.96–1.53)

.089

 Quartile 3

2.20 (1.82–2.58)

.000

1.80 (1.45–2.15)

.000

1.73 (1.40–2.07)

.000

1.35 (1.05–1.65)

.022

 Quartile 2

3.62 (3.17–4.07)

.000

2.77 (2.36–3.18)

.000

2.46 (2.06–2.87)

.000

1.80 (1.43–2.16)

.000

 Quartile 1

        
 

n = 17,332 (98%)

 

n = 16,979 (96%)

 

n = 16,246 (92%)

   
 

log pseudolikelihood = −6807884.4

 

log pseudolikelihood = −6413004.9

 

log pseudolikelihood = −5969405.4

   
 

F-adjusted = 0.56 (p = 0.827)

 

F-adjusted = 0.99 (p = 0.445)

 

F-adjusted = 0.95 (p = 0.480)

   

Occupational class

 I (highest)e

----

---

----

---

----

---

----

---

 II

1.56 (1.06–2.31)

.025

1.37 (0.92–2.04)

.121

1.35 (0.88–1.82)

.142

1.09 (0.67–1.51)

.674

 III

2.08 (1.48–2.93)

.000

1.78 (1.26–2.52)

.002

1.60 (1.15–2.04)

.009

1.10 (0.73–1.48)

.587

 IV

2.94 (2.13–4.07)

.000

2.27 (1.63–3.17)

.000

2.13 (1.63–2.62)

.000

1.26 (0.86–1.65)

.208

 V

3.61 (2.53–5.16)

.000

2.55 (1.77–3.66)

.000

2.35 (1.77–2.92)

.000

1.25 (0.81–1.69)

.270

 

n = 17,111 (97%)

 

n = 16,778 (95%)

 

n = 16,068 (91%)

 

n = 16,023 (91%)

 
 

log pseudolikelihood = −6790156.0

 

log pseudolikelihood = −6382456.4

 

log pseudolikelihood = −5941464.8

 

log pseudolikelihood = −5823027.6

 
 

F-adjusted = 0.28 (p = 0.979)

 

F-adjusted = 0.60 (p = 0.798)

 

F-adjusted = 0.90 (p = 0.527)

 

F-adjusted = 1.52 (p = 0.137)

 
  1. Models 1, 2 and 3 were built separately for each indicator of SEP. Model 4 is one single model with the three indicators of SEP included simultaneously
  2. aModel 1: adjusted by demographic variables (age in groups, sex, area of residence, and marital status)
  3. bModel 2: adjusted by demographic and behavioral variables (smoking, sweet and sweetened beverage intake, toothbrushing, and dental visits)
  4. cModel 3: adjusted by demographic, behavioral, and psychosocial variables (mental health, social support, family function, work-related stress, and job satisfaction. Work-related stress and job satisfaction with imputed data)
  5. dModel 4: adjusted by demographic, behavioral, psychosocial, and socioeconomic variables (income, work-related stress, and job satisfaction with imputed data). To avoid multicollinearity, the degree of correlation between socioeconomic variables was measured. The highest correlation found (between education and occupational class) was moderate (Spearman’s rho = 0.47; p < 0.001)
  6. eReference category